StackAdapt vs Google Display & Video 360
Six of fourteen models named StackAdapt first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Display & Video 360. StackAdapt was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Google Display & Video 360 by eight and StackAdapt carries 36 labels and Google Display & Video 360 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
By Google, Mountain View, California, United States, founded 1998. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.
By framing
StackAdaptFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGoogle Display & Video 360
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, StackAdapt and Google Display & Video 360 were named in the same answer 106 times, of the 388 answers naming StackAdapt and the 176 naming Google Display & Video 360. In those answers Google Display & Video 360 took the first choice twelve times and StackAdapt thirty-two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
StackAdapt Google Display & Video 360 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackAdapt on the left and Google Display & Video 360 on the right.The direct prompt
StackAdapt first, Google Display & Video 360 not the choice
6 of 14 modelsGoogle Display & Video 360 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
StackAdapt4%#9 of 11Google Display & Video 3600%#– of 11StackAdapt32%#1 of 13Google Display & Video 3602%#8 of 13Google Display & Video 36012%#2 of 9StackAdapt2%#5 of 9What the models said about StackAdapt
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“1. StackAdapt – Best for Programmatic & Multi-Channel Reach ... Designed specifically for advertisers who need programmatic sophistication without enterprise-level complexity or costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“This programmatic advertising platform is highly regarded for mid-market advertisers, offering strong video capabilities and a user-friendly interface.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Google Display & Video 360
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Choose Display & Video 360 if you need more advanced programmatic buying, richer audience targeting, and more control across CTV and premium video.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.