AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Video ads › Vibe.co vs Google Display & Video 360
Video advertising · October 2026 Edition

Vibe.co vs Google Display & Video 360

Zero of fourteen models named Vibe.co first on the direct prompt; zero named Google Display & Video 360. Vibe.co was named by eight of the fourteen models and Google Display & Video 360 by eight and Vibe.co carries 17 labels and Google Display & Video 360 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vibe.co

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Google Display & Video 360

accepted challenger

By Google, Mountain View, California, United States, founded 1998. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1710A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vibe.co reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs Vibe.co · StackAdapt vs Google Display & Video 360 · YouTube Ads vs Vibe.co

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Vibe.coFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGoogle Display & Video 360
Direct00
Paraphrase111 against Google Display & Video 360
Comparative10
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vibe.co and Google Display & Video 360 stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Vibe.co Google Display & Video 360 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vibe.co on the left and Google Display & Video 360 on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vibe.co and Google Display & Video 360 stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Video Ads, MNTN, Vibe.co
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Meta Ads, StackAdapt, Vibe.co, YouTube Ads
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, LinkedIn Video Ads, The Trade Desk, Vibe.co

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Grok 4.1 FastLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Mistral SmallStackAdapt alternatives: Demandbase, YouTube Ads
DeepSeek V4 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads, StackAdapt alternatives: Google Ads
Kimi K2LinkedIn Video Ads, YouTube Ads alternatives: Hey Sid, StackAdapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Demandbase, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll, Demandbase, Hey Sid
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Muse Glimmer 30BLinkedIn Sponsored Video / LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: Google Video, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Vibe.co leads by seven points.
Vibe.co7%#4 of 11
Google Display & Video 3600%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Vibe.co leads by six points.
Vibe.co8%#5 of 13
Google Display & Video 3602%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Google Display & Video 360 leads at enterprise.
Google Display & Video 36012%#2 of 9
Vibe.co2%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vibe.co

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Vibe.co is a self-serve streaming TV platform built for performance marketers who want CTV advertising to run like search and social” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are highly focused on ROI/pipeline tracking and have a modest budget: Choose Vibe.co.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Google Display & Video 360

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Choose Display & Video 360 if you need more advanced programmatic buying, richer audience targeting, and more control across CTV and premium video.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.