AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Video ads › LinkedIn Video Ads vs Vibe.co
Video advertising · October 2026 Edition

LinkedIn Video Ads vs Vibe.co

Five of fourteen models named LinkedIn Video Ads first on the direct prompt; zero named Vibe.co. LinkedIn Video Ads was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Vibe.co by eight and LinkedIn Video Ads carries 18 labels and Vibe.co 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

LinkedIn Video Ads

accepted challenger

By LinkedIn, Sunnyvale, United States, founded 2002. Named in one category this edition.

Vibe.co

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share11%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1817A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, LinkedIn Video Ads reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs LinkedIn Video Ads · StackAdapt vs Vibe.co · YouTube Ads vs LinkedIn Video Ads

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LinkedIn Video AdsFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVibe.co
Direct50
Paraphrase11
Comparative01
Budget-constrained032 against LinkedIn Video Ads
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against LinkedIn Video Ads
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where LinkedIn Video Ads and Vibe.co stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
LinkedIn Video Ads Vibe.co first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, LinkedIn Video Ads on the left and Vibe.co on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where LinkedIn Video Ads and Vibe.co stood in it.

LinkedIn Video Ads first, Vibe.co an alternative

5 of 14 modelsVibe.co was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Meta Ads, StackAdapt, Vibe.co, YouTube Ads
DeepSeek V4 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads, StackAdapt alternatives: Google Ads
Kimi K2LinkedIn Video Ads, YouTube Ads alternatives: Hey Sid, StackAdapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Demandbase, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Video Ads, MNTN, Vibe.co
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, LinkedIn Video Ads, The Trade Desk, Vibe.co

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Grok 4.1 FastLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Mistral SmallStackAdapt alternatives: Demandbase, YouTube Ads
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll, Demandbase, Hey Sid
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Muse Glimmer 30BLinkedIn Sponsored Video / LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: Google Video, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
LinkedIn Video Ads leads by seven points.
LinkedIn Video Ads15%#2 of 11
Vibe.co7%#4 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
LinkedIn Video Ads leads by four points.
LinkedIn Video Ads11%#4 of 13
Vibe.co8%#5 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
LinkedIn Video Ads leads by twelve points.
LinkedIn Video Ads14%#1 of 9
Vibe.co2%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about LinkedIn Video Ads

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“LinkedIn came out as the worst-performing ad channel in terms ... of IVT.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Usually more expensive, but can be worth it if your audience is very specific.” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“LinkedIn is only cost‑effective for B2B leads.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“LinkedIn Video Ads – Best for Precision Decision-Maker Targeting ... Provides the most precise professional targeting available” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with LinkedIn for direct professional engagement and YouTube for broader reach” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LinkedIn Video Ads: The Gold Standard for Precision & ABM ... LinkedIn is unmatched” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Vibe.co

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Vibe.co is a self-serve streaming TV platform built for performance marketers who want CTV advertising to run like search and social” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are highly focused on ROI/pipeline tracking and have a modest budget: Choose Vibe.co.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.