AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Video ads › Vibe.co vs MNTN
Video advertising · October 2026 Edition

Vibe.co vs MNTN

Zero of fourteen models named Vibe.co first on the direct prompt; zero named MNTN. Vibe.co was named by eight of the fourteen models and MNTN by ten and Vibe.co carries 17 labels and MNTN 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Vibe.co

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

MNTN

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1715A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Vibe.co reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs Vibe.co · StackAdapt vs MNTN · YouTube Ads vs Vibe.co

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Vibe.coFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMNTN
Direct00
Paraphrase11
Comparative10
Budget-constrained30
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Vibe.co and MNTN were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 71 answers naming Vibe.co and the 38 naming MNTN. In those answers MNTN took the first choice two times and Vibe.co five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Vibe.co and MNTN stood in it.
ModelDirectMNParaphraseMNComparativeMNBudget-constrainedMNScale-constrainedMNNegativeMN
Claude Haiku 4.5MNMN
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashMNMNMN
Perplexity SonarMN
Grok 4.1 FastMN
Mistral SmallMN
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2MN
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 LunaMN
Muse Glimmer 30B
Vibe.coMN MNTN first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Vibe.co on the left and MNTN on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Vibe.co and MNTN stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Video Ads, MNTN, Vibe.co
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Meta Ads, StackAdapt, Vibe.co, YouTube Ads
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, LinkedIn Video Ads, The Trade Desk, Vibe.co

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Grok 4.1 FastLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Mistral SmallStackAdapt alternatives: Demandbase, YouTube Ads
DeepSeek V4 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads, StackAdapt alternatives: Google Ads
Kimi K2LinkedIn Video Ads, YouTube Ads alternatives: Hey Sid, StackAdapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Demandbase, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll, Demandbase, Hey Sid
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Muse Glimmer 30BLinkedIn Sponsored Video / LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: Google Video, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Vibe.co7%#4 of 11
MNTN7%#7 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Vibe.co leads by six points.
Vibe.co8%#5 of 13
MNTN2%#6 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Vibe.co2%#– of 9
MNTN2%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Vibe.co

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Vibe.co is a self-serve streaming TV platform built for performance marketers who want CTV advertising to run like search and social” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are highly focused on ROI/pipeline tracking and have a modest budget: Choose Vibe.co.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about MNTN

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“StackAdapt and MNTN are the best choices for dedicated CTV and online video advertising” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“MNTN is built for brands that don't have in-house video production, with higher budget minimums and managed service overhead.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
“have democratized CTV for growth marketers and SMBs by offering self-serve buying with budgets as low as $50/day” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.