Video advertising · October 2026 Edition
StackAdapt vs Vibe.co
Six of fourteen models named StackAdapt first on the direct prompt; zero named Vibe.co. StackAdapt was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Vibe.co by eight and StackAdapt carries 36 labels and Vibe.co 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share32%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels3617A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, StackAdapt reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.YouTube Ads was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs YouTube Ads · StackAdapt vs Meta Ads · StackAdapt vs LinkedIn Video Ads
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video advertising page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
StackAdaptFirst choices, of fourteen modelsVibe.co
Direct60
Paraphrase101
Comparative01
Budget-constrained03
Scale-constrained10
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where StackAdapt and Vibe.co stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
StackAdapt Vibe.co first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackAdapt on the left and Vibe.co on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where StackAdapt and Vibe.co stood in it.
StackAdapt first, Vibe.co an alternative
6 of 14 modelsVibe.co was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Video Ads, MNTN, Vibe.co
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, LinkedIn Video Ads, The Trade Desk, Vibe.co
Mistral SmallStackAdapt alternatives: Demandbase, YouTube Ads
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt
Qwen 3.7 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads, StackAdapt alternatives: Google Ads
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll, Demandbase, Hey Sid
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Meta Ads, StackAdapt, Vibe.co, YouTube Ads
DeepSeek V4 FlashLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Kimi K2LinkedIn Video Ads, YouTube Ads alternatives: Hey Sid, StackAdapt
GLM 4.7 FlashXLinkedIn Video Ads alternatives: Demandbase, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Muse Glimmer 30BLinkedIn Sponsored Video / LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: Google Video, StackAdapt, YouTube Ads
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-5.4 miniLinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Grok 4.20LinkedIn Campaign Manager alternatives: YouTube Ads
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Vibe.co leads by four points.
Vibe.co7%#4 of 11StackAdapt4%#9 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: StackAdapt leads at mid-market.
StackAdapt32%#1 of 13Vibe.co8%#5 of 13Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
StackAdapt2%#5 of 9Vibe.co2%#– of 9What the models said about StackAdapt
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“1. StackAdapt – Best for Programmatic & Multi-Channel Reach ... Designed specifically for advertisers who need programmatic sophistication without enterprise-level complexity or costs.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“This programmatic advertising platform is highly regarded for mid-market advertisers, offering strong video capabilities and a user-friendly interface.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Vibe.co
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Vibe.co is a self-serve streaming TV platform built for performance marketers who want CTV advertising to run like search and social” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you are highly focused on ROI/pipeline tracking and have a modest budget: Choose Vibe.co.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
StackAdapt vs YouTube AdsStackAdapt vs Meta AdsStackAdapt vs LinkedIn Video AdsStackAdapt vs MNTNStackAdapt vs TikTok AdsStackAdapt vs Google Display & Video 360YouTube Ads vs Vibe.coMeta Ads vs Vibe.coLinkedIn Video Ads vs Vibe.coVibe.co vs MNTNVibe.co vs TikTok AdsVibe.co vs Google Display & Video 360All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full video ads standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.