GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › LinkedIn Video Ads · September 2026 Edition
LinkedIn · 1 category · Ranked

LinkedIn Video Ads

38Judge labels
11First choices
10Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Video ads for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 121 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 11 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In video ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LinkedIn Video Ads for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Video advertisingMarketing4%7 of 12118%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn Video Ads yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn Video Ads across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500112
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels9
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Primary: LinkedIn Video Ads for paid advertising (best ROI for B2B)” Mistral Small · Video ads · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with LinkedIn Video Ads for distribution” MiniMax M2.5 · Video ads · direct prompt · first choice
“LinkedIn Video Ads for professional targeting and lead generation” Mistral Small · Video ads · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“LinkedIn targets professional intent and B2B buyers” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Video ads · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While generally pricier, it can be cost-effective for B2B companies with targeted campaigns.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video ads · budget prompt · soft negative
“Not Ideal for Video-First Strategies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Video ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Video Ads, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Video Ads was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
YouTube Ads30 of 3811Not in the top three
TikTok Ads21 of 381Not in the top three
Meta Ads20 of 387Not in the top three
Vibe.co12 of 383Not in the top three
StackAdapt11 of 382Not in the top three
The Trade Desk11 of 381Not in the top three
MNTN11 of 380Not in the top three
Pinterest7 of 380Not in the top three
Roku6 of 380Not in the top three
Hulu5 of 380Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Video Ads. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 38 answers that named LinkedIn Video Ads and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

business.linkedin.comYour site2
demandbase.com2
gorillacreative.com2
support.google.com2
vibe.co2
6sense.com1
ads.tiktok.com1
adwave.com1
atlassian.com1
dacast.com1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Video Ads came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LinkedIn Video Ads

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LinkedIn Video Ads; a claim can dispute any of them.
LinkedIn 8

The company

LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn Video Ads.
Website
linkedin.com
Headquarters
Sunnyvale, United States
Founded
2002

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Video Ads's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Video Ads, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack