AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Native ads › StackAdapt vs Teads
Native and content advertising · October 2026 Edition

StackAdapt vs Teads

Twelve of fourteen models named StackAdapt first on the direct prompt; zero named Teads. Both were named by all fourteen models and StackAdapt carries 41 labels and Teads 74, so the shares are not directly comparable.

StackAdapt

endorsed leader

Named in eight categories this edition.

Teads

accepted challenger

By Q28872999, New York City, United States, founded 2005. Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share41%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4174A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, StackAdapt reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt vs Revcontent · StackAdapt vs MGID · StackAdapt vs LinkedIn Sponsored Content

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
StackAdaptFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeads
Direct1203 against Teads
Paraphrase512 against Teads
Comparative05
Budget-constrained015 against Teads
Scale-constrained30
Negative016 against Teads
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, StackAdapt and Teads were named in the same answer ninety-three times, of the 388 answers naming StackAdapt and the 198 naming Teads. In those answers Teads took the first choice nine times and StackAdapt thirty-two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where StackAdapt and Teads stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
StackAdapt Teads first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackAdapt on the left and Teads on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where StackAdapt and Teads stood in it.

StackAdapt first, Teads an alternative

12 of 14 modelsTeads was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Teads
GPT-5.4 miniStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, Microsoft Advertising Audience Ads
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola
Grok 4.20StackAdapt alternatives: Sharethrough, Taboola, Teads
Mistral SmallStackAdapt
DeepSeek V4 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, NetLine, ViB
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt alternatives: Abmatic AI, Demandbase
Qwen 3.7 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: Raptive, Simpli.fi, Taboola, Teads
Kimi K2StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Taboola, Teads
GLM 4.7 FlashXStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising, SmartyAds DSP
Muse Glimmer 30BStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola / Realize, Teads

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: 6sense, AdLib, Basis, Demandbase, Dianomi
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: AdRoll ABM

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
StackAdapt leads by eight points.
StackAdapt12%#4 of 8
Teads4%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
StackAdapt leads by thirty-seven points.
StackAdapt41%#1 of 9
Teads4%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
StackAdapt leads by ten points.
StackAdapt18%#2 of 10
Teads8%#5 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about StackAdapt

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Teads

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid the "big two" (Taboola/Outbrain)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“be very careful reading Taboola or Outbrain agreements. They historically include aggressive exclusivity clauses and auto-renewal traps.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reputable alternatives (fewer complaints): Outbrain, Taboola (with controls), Sharethrough.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Performance marketing, content-driven brands, premium publisher environments” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Taboola or Outbrain if you want scale and mainstream publisher reach” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.