AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Native ads › StackAdapt vs LinkedIn Sponsored Content
Native and content advertising · October 2026 Edition

StackAdapt vs LinkedIn Sponsored Content

Twelve of fourteen models named StackAdapt first on the direct prompt; two named LinkedIn Sponsored Content. StackAdapt was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and LinkedIn Sponsored Content by eleven and StackAdapt carries 41 labels and LinkedIn Sponsored Content 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

StackAdapt

endorsed leader

Named in eight categories this edition.

LinkedIn Sponsored Content

accepted challenger

By LinkedIn, Sunnyvale, United States, founded 2002. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share41%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4119A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, StackAdapt reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt vs Revcontent · StackAdapt vs MGID · StackAdapt vs Teads

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
StackAdaptFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLinkedIn Sponsored Content
Direct122
Paraphrase53
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained30
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where StackAdapt and LinkedIn Sponsored Content stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
StackAdapt LinkedIn Sponsored Content first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, StackAdapt on the left and LinkedIn Sponsored Content on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where StackAdapt and LinkedIn Sponsored Content stood in it.

StackAdapt first, LinkedIn Sponsored Content an alternative

12 of 14 modelsLinkedIn Sponsored Content was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Teads
GPT-5.4 miniStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, Microsoft Advertising Audience Ads
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola
Grok 4.1 FastStackAdapt alternatives: Sharethrough, Taboola, Teads
Mistral SmallStackAdapt
DeepSeek V4 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, NetLine, ViB
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt alternatives: Abmatic AI, Demandbase
Qwen 3.7 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: Raptive, Simpli.fi, Taboola, Teads
Kimi K2StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Taboola, Teads
GLM 4.7 FlashXStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising, SmartyAds DSP
Muse Glimmer 30BStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola / Realize, Teads

LinkedIn Sponsored Content first, StackAdapt not the choice

2 of 14 modelsStackAdapt was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: 6sense, AdLib, Basis, Demandbase, Dianomi
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: AdRoll ABM

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
LinkedIn Sponsored Content leads by ten points.
LinkedIn Sponsored Content21%#3 of 8
StackAdapt12%#4 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: StackAdapt leads at mid-market.
StackAdapt41%#1 of 9
LinkedIn Sponsored Content10%#4 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: LinkedIn Sponsored Content leads at enterprise.
LinkedIn Sponsored Content20%#1 of 10
StackAdapt18%#2 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about StackAdapt

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about LinkedIn Sponsored Content

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Start with LinkedIn Sponsored Content for your primary native ads effort since it offers the best B2B targeting and highest intent.” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“StackAdapt and LinkedIn Sponsored Content are often the top recommendations” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd start with LinkedIn Sponsored Content... use LinkedIn as the main B2B channel” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.