AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Native ads › MGID vs Teads
Native and content advertising · October 2026 Edition

MGID vs Teads

Zero of fourteen models named MGID first on the direct prompt; zero named Teads. Both were named by all fourteen models and MGID carries 46 labels and Teads 74, so the shares are not directly comparable.

MGID

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Teads

accepted challenger

By Q28872999, New York City, United States, founded 2005. Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share12%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate30%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4674A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, MGID reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs MGID · StackAdapt vs Teads · Revcontent vs MGID

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MGIDFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTeads
Direct001 against MGID · 3 against Teads
Paraphrase012 against MGID · 2 against Teads
Comparative05
Budget-constrained615 against Teads
Scale-constrained00
Negative0111 against MGID · 6 against Teads
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, MGID and Teads were named in the same answer ninety-seven times, of the 112 answers naming MGID and the 198 naming Teads. In those answers Teads took the first choice nine times and MGID twenty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where MGID and Teads stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
MGID Teads first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, MGID on the left and Teads on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where MGID and Teads stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Teads
Grok 4.20StackAdapt alternatives: Sharethrough, Taboola, Teads
Qwen 3.7 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: Raptive, Simpli.fi, Taboola, Teads
Kimi K2StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Taboola, Teads
Muse Glimmer 30BStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola / Realize, Teads

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, Microsoft Advertising Audience Ads
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: 6sense, AdLib, Basis, Demandbase, Dianomi
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola
Mistral SmallStackAdapt
DeepSeek V4 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, NetLine, ViB
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt alternatives: Abmatic AI, Demandbase
GLM 4.7 FlashXStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising, SmartyAds DSP
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: AdRoll ABM

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
MGID leads by twenty-five points.
MGID29%#1 of 8
Teads4%#6 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
MGID leads by eight points.
MGID12%#3 of 9
Teads4%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Teads leads at enterprise.
Teads8%#5 of 10
MGID2%#8 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about MGID

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“What I'd Avoid or Use with Caution - MGID – Heavy entertainment/clickbait inventory” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“High-volume, low-CPC affiliate-style networks such as MGID and RichAds: ... they can need substantial filtering to avoid invalid traffic and low-quality placements.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many advertisers limit MGID, Revcontent and similar performance networks to direct-response use cases with strict creative compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the tightest budget, MGID appears to be the best starting point due to its lower CPCs and accessibility for beginners.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The Overall Best Choice: MGID ... most accessible and cost-effective native ad network for small businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID stands out as the best native advertising platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Teads

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid the "big two" (Taboola/Outbrain)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“be very careful reading Taboola or Outbrain agreements. They historically include aggressive exclusivity clauses and auto-renewal traps.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Reputable alternatives (fewer complaints): Outbrain, Taboola (with controls), Sharethrough.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Performance marketing, content-driven brands, premium publisher environments” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Taboola or Outbrain if you want scale and mainstream publisher reach” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.