MGID vs Teads
Zero of twelve models named MGID first on the direct prompt; one named Teads. Both were named by all twelve models and MGID carries 47 labels and Teads 70, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
By Q28872999, New York City, United States, founded 2005. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.
By framing
MGIDFirst choices, of twelve modelsTeads
The direct prompt
Teads first, MGID not the choice
1 of 12 modelsMGID was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Teads9%#4 of 10MGID0%#9 of 10What the models said about MGID
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Similar to Revcontent with large international reach but questionable inventory quality” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Requires heavy manual filtering and pre-bid fraud integration to avoid bot traffic.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid (High Risk)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best Overall for Low-Cost Testing: MGID ... most accessible entry point for businesses new to native advertising or working with strict financial caps.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID represents the best starting point due to its extremely low minimum spend, competitive CPC rates, and self-serve interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID is the clear winner for limited budgets – multiple sources confirm it's the most accessible entry point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Teads
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid on a Tight Budget: Outbrain... Running ads with less than this often yields poor results.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Taboola, Outbrain (now Teads), StackAdapt, and other premium platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium platforms (Taboola, Outbrain) until you validate ROAS” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“I'd recommend starting with Outbrain Engage for both native advertising and content recommendation widgets” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for B2B, I’d lean Outbrain for lead-gen/content-driven campaigns” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Teads offers a cleaner, more brand-safe user experience. It provides a full-funnel approach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.