Zero of fourteen models named MGID first on the direct prompt; zero named Taboola. Both were named by all fourteen models and MGID carries 46 labels and Taboola 61, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
New York City, United States, founded 2007. Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, MGID and Taboola were named in the same answer ninety-five times, of the 112 answers naming MGID and the 186 naming Taboola. In those answers Taboola took the first choice eighteen times and MGID twenty-one.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What I'd Avoid or Use with Caution - MGID – Heavy entertainment/clickbait inventory” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“High-volume, low-CPC affiliate-style networks such as MGID and RichAds: ... they can need substantial filtering to avoid invalid traffic and low-quality placements.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Many advertisers limit MGID, Revcontent and similar performance networks to direct-response use cases with strict creative compliance” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the tightest budget, MGID appears to be the best starting point due to its lower CPCs and accessibility for beginners.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“The Overall Best Choice: MGID ... most accessible and cost-effective native ad network for small businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID stands out as the best native advertising platform for companies with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid the "big two" (Taboola/Outbrain)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Taboola served 61.1% of all problematic native ads analyzed ... While Taboola is safe for massive brands with strict compliance teams, if you are a smaller advertiser, you risk your brand” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Best all-round reach: Taboola, through its Realize platform—450 billion recommendations a month, and the deepest, most liquid auction on the open web."” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Massive reach, brand awareness, large-scale campaigns ... Deepest liquidity in the open web, massive scale” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The undisputed leader in sheer volume and liquidity... If your goal is volume, start with Taboola or Teads.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.