Zero of twelve models named MGID first on the direct prompt; zero named Taboola. Both were named by all twelve models and MGID carries 47 labels and Taboola 59, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
New York City, United States, founded 2007. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, MGID and Taboola were named in the same answer 122 times, of the 131 answers naming MGID and the 181 naming Taboola. In those answers Taboola took the first choice twenty-six times and MGID thirty-six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Similar to Revcontent with large international reach but questionable inventory quality” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Requires heavy manual filtering and pre-bid fraud integration to avoid bot traffic.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid (High Risk)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Best Overall for Low-Cost Testing: MGID ... most accessible entry point for businesses new to native advertising or working with strict financial caps.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID represents the best starting point due to its extremely low minimum spend, competitive CPC rates, and self-serve interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“MGID is the clear winner for limited budgets – multiple sources confirm it's the most accessible entry point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Many advertisers report 100% bot traffic with 100% bounce rates ... Rating: 2.7/5 on Trustpilot (rated "Poor")” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid premium platforms (Taboola, Outbrain) until you validate ROAS” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Outbrain and Taboola are the largest players, but evaluate whether their audience matches your target (they skew more consumer/publisher-focused)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Reach: 1.4 billion unique users/month across 10,000+ premium publishers - Strength: Largest content discovery platform by recommendation volume” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Taboola is the largest independent content discovery engine on the web... Unmatched Scale: Taboola offers massive reach” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Taboola and Outbrain are the most widely used... Taboola is the biggest of all the native advertising platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.