AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Native ads › Taboola vs Sharethrough
Native and content advertising · October 2026 Edition

Taboola vs Sharethrough

Zero of fourteen models named Taboola first on the direct prompt; zero named Sharethrough. Taboola was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sharethrough by ten and Taboola carries 61 labels and Sharethrough 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Taboola

criticized challenger

New York City, United States, founded 2007. Named in five categories this edition.

Sharethrough

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate33%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6115A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Taboola reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.StackAdapt was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. StackAdapt vs Taboola · StackAdapt vs Sharethrough · Revcontent vs Taboola

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the native and content advertising page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TaboolaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSharethrough
Direct004 against Taboola
Paraphrase203 against Taboola
Comparative90
Budget-constrained006 against Taboola
Scale-constrained01
Negative207 against Taboola
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Taboola and Sharethrough were named in the same answer forty-two times, of the 186 answers naming Taboola and the 47 naming Sharethrough. In those answers Sharethrough took the first choice three times and Taboola fifteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Taboola and Sharethrough stood in it.
ModelDirectSHParaphraseSHComparativeSHBudget-constrainedSHScale-constrainedSHNegativeSH
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashSH
Perplexity SonarSH
Grok 4.1 FastSHSHSH
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashSH
Kimi K2SH
GLM 4.7 FlashXSHSH
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
TaboolaSH Sharethrough first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Taboola on the left and Sharethrough on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Taboola and Sharethrough stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola
Grok 4.1 FastStackAdapt alternatives: Sharethrough, Taboola, Teads
Qwen 3.7 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: Raptive, Simpli.fi, Taboola, Teads
Kimi K2StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Taboola, Teads

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Teads
GPT-5.4 miniStackAdapt alternatives: AdRoll ABM, Demandbase, Microsoft Advertising Audience Ads
Gemini 3.5 FlashLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: 6sense, AdLib, Basis, Demandbase, Dianomi
Mistral SmallStackAdapt
DeepSeek V4 FlashStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, NetLine, ViB
Llama 4 MaverickStackAdapt alternatives: Abmatic AI, Demandbase
GLM 4.7 FlashXStackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising
MiniMax M2.5StackAdapt alternatives: LinkedIn Sponsored Content, Microsoft Advertising, SmartyAds DSP
GPT-6 LunaLinkedIn Sponsored Content alternatives: AdRoll ABM
Muse Glimmer 30BStackAdapt alternatives: Taboola / Realize, Teads

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Taboola leads by six points.
Taboola6%#5 of 8
Sharethrough0%#7 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Taboola leads by two points.
Taboola4%#6 of 9
Sharethrough2%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Taboola leads by sixteen points.
Taboola16%#3 of 10
Sharethrough0%#10 of 10
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Taboola

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid the "big two" (Taboola/Outbrain)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Taboola served 61.1% of all problematic native ads analyzed ... While Taboola is safe for massive brands with strict compliance teams, if you are a smaller advertiser, you risk your brand” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“"Best all-round reach: Taboola, through its Realize platform—450 billion recommendations a month, and the deepest, most liquid auction on the open web."” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Massive reach, brand awareness, large-scale campaigns ... Deepest liquidity in the open web, massive scale” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“The undisputed leader in sheer volume and liquidity... If your goal is volume, start with Taboola or Teads.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Sharethrough

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“prioritize platforms like StackAdapt (omnichannel) or Sharethrough (brand-safe in-feed) per recent analyses” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Leverage TripleLift or Sharethrough to dynamically transform standard assets into native formats” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
“If your goal is premium brand perception and engagement, consider Sharethrough or Nativo.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.