Every category where a model named Nativo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Native and content advertising	Marketing	0%	11 of 86	10%	21	accepted challenger	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Nativo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Native ads · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 58 → 16 of 61

Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 11 of 79

Enterprise▲+7Since September 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

9%from 2% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 8 → 4 of 65

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Native ads	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 13 → 11 of 86

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Nativo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.20	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	1	0	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative26 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labels2

Negative16 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider Nativo as a comparison if contextual placement and first-party audience segments are priorities” GPT-6 Luna · Native ads · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Top-rated ones like Outbrain, TripleLift, or Nativo score higher on G2 for quality.” Grok 4.20 · Native ads · negative prompt · alternative

“Focuses on true native storytelling inside premium publisher environments” Perplexity Sonar · Native ads · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you want to run native without forcing redirects: Choose Nativo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid ... Nativo requires ~$10,000+/month” Kimi K2 · Native ads · budget prompt · hard negative

“Nativo ($10,000+) are typically out of reach for truly limited budgets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Native ads · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nativo, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nativo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Teads68 of 7612Not among the top eight

Taboola63 of 7617Not among the top eight

StackAdapt43 of 769Not among the top eight

MGID43 of 766Not among the top eight

Revcontent40 of 768Not among the top eight

Sharethrough35 of 762Not among the top eight

TripleLift29 of 760Not among the top eight

LinkedIn Sponsored Content13 of 765Not among the top eight

Yahoo Gemini9 of 760Not among the top eight

The Trade Desk8 of 761Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nativo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 75 of the 76 answers that named Nativo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aidigital.com51

guideflow.com41

madgicx.com34

realize.com31

g2.com28

admetrics.io27

zigpoll.com27

smartyads.com26

us.fitgap.com23

getadlib.com19

307 of the 307 domain citations in answers naming Nativo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

aidigital.com/blog/native-advertising-platforms49

guideflow.com/blog/native-advertising-software41

madgicx.com/blog/ad-tech-platform-for-native-advertising33

realize.com/marketing-hub/native-advertising-platform29

admetrics.io/post/native-ads-platforms24

smartyads.com/blog/best-native-advertising-platforms20

getadlib.com/blog/best-native-advertising-platforms19

us.fitgap.com/search/native-advertising-software/enterprise18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

nativo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Nativo takes 0% of first choices and StackAdapt takes 41%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “native advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best native advertising platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 6,600 a month (“nativo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 755 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 242 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 25 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,301
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 11 of 86 in native ads

Segment leader

41%

StackAdapt

First choices: 6 across its categories
Named in: 76 answers
Its own site cited: in 75 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on nativo.com

607

subdomains included

Content

380

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

6 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Categories named
News or press	346	undated	Mobile apps, Native ads
Podcast or video	10	undated
Glossary or explainer	7	undated
Comparison	5	undated
Case study	4	undated
Conference or event	4	undated
Report or ebook	3	undated
Webinar or virtual event	1	undated

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page nativo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Nativo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nativo; a claim can dispute any of them.

Nativo / Life360 Ads 1

Follow Nativo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Nativo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The most advanced platform for premium ad experiences, built to help advertisers connect and publishers grow. It's better advertising through better technology.
nativo.com
For: advertisers and publishers
nativo.com
Certifications: member in good standing of the Network Advertising Initiative (NAI)
Customers named: Explore GeorgiaGeorgia Department of Economic DevelopmentMiles Partnership
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Nativo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nativo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nativo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nativo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Nativo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Nativo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Nativo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.