| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 27 of 71 | 35% | 17 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 27 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 42 of 59 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 27 of 71 |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 27 of 66 |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 59, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Pick ZoomInfo-based options if your priority is data quality and sales-marketing alignment.” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Strong B2B data foundation - Combines intent signals with multi-channel orchestration” MiniMax M2.5 · ABM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you already use ZoomInfo contact data → ZoomInfo Marketing (unified GTM platform)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative
“ZoomInfo Marketing if your strategy is heavily data-driven B2B targeting” Perplexity Sonar · Email marketing · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Aggressive contract terms, auto-renewals with short cancellation windows... Legal scrutiny over coercive practices.” Grok 4.20 · ABM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid purchasing it *as* your ABM platform; you'll be disappointed.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ABM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bombora, ZoomInfo, and Common Room are described this way, so they can be useful, but they are not complete ABM systems on their own.” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative
“noted for being "incredibly expensive" and may not be cost-effective for smaller teams” Mistral Small · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 65 answers that named ZoomInfo Marketing and are not a share of its labels.
178 of the 226 domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo Marketing came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What ZoomInfo Marketing's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: engineering.zoominfo.com/bulk-data-search-and-match, engineering.zoominfo.com/effortlessly-query-your-big-data-infrastructure, engineering.zoominfo.com/zoominfo-data-platform-zdp-ingestion-process-improvement, engineering.zoominfo.com/building-an-automl-sdk-to-enhance-data-science-capabilities, engineering.zoominfo.com/designing-a-serverless-cost-efficient-tool-for-data-traceability. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo Marketing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo Marketing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZoomInfo Marketing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: