AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › ZoomInfo GTM Workspace · October 2026 Edition
ZoomInfo · 3 categories · Named, not ranked

ZoomInfo GTM Workspace

18Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ZoomInfo GTM Workspace was named 6 times in AI SDR and 2 other categories, where Apollo.io led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ZoomInfo GTM Workspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI SDR agentsSales2%17 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales0%29 of 760%4under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Call tracking platformsMarketing0%32 of 630%1under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43%

Movement

Since September 2026, ZoomInfo GTM Workspace held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI SDR · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 of 70, unchanged
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 36 → 21 of 69

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI SDR0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 17 of 77, unchanged
Revenue intel0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 32 → 29 of 76
Call tracking0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 32 of 63, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ZoomInfo GTM Workspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend ZoomInfo GTM Workspace if you want a strong mix of prospecting, verified B2B data, account intelligence, and meeting-booking workflow support in one platform.” Perplexity Sonar · AI SDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“combines verified B2B contact data, buyer intent signals, and conversation intelligence for outbound call tracking at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Call tracking · direct prompt · alternative
“Best for B2B teams that want to leverage buyer intent signals and account prioritization” Mistral Small · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best for Data & Insights” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue intel · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZoomInfo GTM Workspace, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZoomInfo GTM Workspace was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Clari Copilot6 of 184Not among the top eight
HubSpot Sales Hub6 of 182Not among the top eight
Calendly5 of 181Not among the top eight
Gong5 of 180Not among the top eight
Chili Piper4 of 182Not among the top eight
HubSpot Meetings4 of 180Not among the top eight
Apollo.io3 of 180Not among the top eight
Cal.com3 of 180Not among the top eight
LeadAngel2 of 181Not among the top eight
Outreach2 of 181Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZoomInfo GTM Workspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 18 answers that named ZoomInfo GTM Workspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.comYour site15
blog.hubspot.com12
albato.com6
avoma.com6
g2.com6
learn.g2.com6
cal.com5
tomba.io5
cleverly.co4
guideflow.com4

Fifty-four of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming ZoomInfo GTM Workspace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow ZoomInfo GTM Workspace

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ZoomInfo is the company behind ZoomInfo GTM Workspace.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Vancouver, Washington, United States
Founded
2000
Ownership
Public, GTM on Nasdaq

Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
single AI-powered platform
Not stated on the pages read
Who it is for, price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What ZoomInfo GTM Workspace's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: university.zoominfo.com/page/gtm-studio, university.zoominfo.com/page/gtm-workspace, pipeline.zoominfo.com/operations/gtm-studio, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/dust-zoominfo-gtm-ai, pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/tam-to-pam-gtm-studio. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZoomInfo GTM Workspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZoomInfo GTM Workspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZoomInfo GTM Workspace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ZoomInfo GTM Workspace is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZoomInfo GTM Workspace, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zoominfo.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.