Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 8 → 4 of 103
2 categories · RankedLeadAngel
93Judge labels
28First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
26% in Lead routing for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 29 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LeadAngel →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business5 of 110
9%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 111
26%29 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise3 of 87
5%35 labels
accepted challenger
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LeadAngel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 26% | 1 of 111 | 3% | 29 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 32% → 31%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 46 of 99 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LeadAngel held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 32% → 31%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
31%from 32% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 1 of 103, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 3 of 80, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM data quality | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 46 of 99 |
| Lead routing | 32% | 31% | =heldSince September 2026: 32% → 31%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LeadAngel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LeadAngel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels7
Paraphrase35 labels18
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained9 labels1
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative93 labels in all, every segment counted; 28 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“LeadAngel is the most consistently recommended option for mid-market / mid-size B2B with complex routing needs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LeanData and LeadAngel are top choices due to their deep integration and advanced routing capabilities.” Mistral Small · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with LeadAngel if you want: - A comprehensive solution that handles routing, matching, and scheduling” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend LeadAngel as a lead assignment and lead-to-account matching tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Llama 4 Maverick · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be cautious about its published matching-accuracy claims, as they carry no public methodology, sample, or test period” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeadAngel, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadAngel was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeadAngel, over the 93 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadAngel was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeadAngel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 93 of the 93 answers that named LeadAngel and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
leadangel.comYour site62
guideflow.com48
pipeline.zoominfo.com48
wonderchat.io36
prospeo.io34
default.com33
cal.com30
cleverly.co29
cognism.com29
leandata.com28
315 of the 377 domain citations in answers naming LeadAngel came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where LeadAngel stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where LeadAngel stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
4
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“leadangel”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 369 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 431 · 8 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 859
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown July 2024, as Deepak Kumar, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
26%
rank 1 of 111 in lead routing
First choices
28
across its categories
- Named in
- 93 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 93 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leadangel.com
577
subdomains included
Content
304
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 219 | 21 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 36 | 0 | 2025-02-06 | ||
| Comparison | 30 | 12 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 13 | 0 | 2025-06-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2025-08-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Calendly alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-23Sales lead management blog
- 2026-09-18Powerrouter alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-16Choosing the perfect automated scheduling software for your business blog
- 2026-09-11Speed to lead statistics blog
- 2026-09-09Top 5 data ladder alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leadangel.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LeadAngel
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LeadAngel is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LeadAngel is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- LeadAngel offers lead routing & lead to account matching solutions. Seamlessly integrate with modern CRMs to streamline lead flow & boost sales performance.
- For
- sales and marketing challenges
- Price stated
- Pricing And Plans leadangel.com
- Free plan or trial
- free leadangel.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPR & SOC 2 CompliantSOC 2 Type II complianceGDPRSOC 2CPRA (formerly CCPA)
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What LeadAngel's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leadangel.com, leadangel.com/pricing, trust.leadangel.com, leadangel.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeadAngel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeadAngel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LeadAngel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LeadAngel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LeadAngel, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LeadAngel is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LeadAngel is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend LeadAngel first in Lead routing and management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.