Every category where a model named LeadAngel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lead routing and management	Sales	32%	1 of 104	5%	38	endorsed leader
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	4%	8 of 104	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LeadAngel yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LeadAngel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	2	1	0	5
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	3	0	0	4
Mistral Small	3	1	1	0	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	1	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	4	0	2	0	6
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	3	1	0	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	4	0	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels5

Paraphrase43 labels18

Comparative24 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained13 labels2

Scale-constrained16 labels2

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative124 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd shortlist LeadAngel or Default — they deliver enterprise-grade routing ... without LeanData's enterprise pricing and complexity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: LeadAngel ... offers the best combination of features, pricing flexibility, and ease of implementation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Distributely (if on HubSpot) or LeadAngel (if multi-CRM) offer the best combination of features and affordability.” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice

“For most mid-market B2B companies (10-100 reps), LeadAngel or Chili Piper offer the best balance of features and cost” Mistral Small · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“LeadAngel Common Issues: - Glitches and malfunctions - software doesn't work consistently, causing routing failures” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lead routing · negative prompt · hard negative

“LeadAngel ⚠️ Minor Caution - Reliability Issues” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LeadAngel, over the 124 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeadAngel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LeanData75 of 12432Compare →

Chili Piper74 of 1244Compare →

HubSpot Sales Hub40 of 1248Not in the top three

Kubaru37 of 1246Not in the top three

Default31 of 1240Not in the top three

RevenueHero28 of 1242Not in the top three

Distribution Engine22 of 1240Not in the top three

DemandTools20 of 1245Not in the top three

Pipedrive19 of 1242Not in the top three

Insycle18 of 1248Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeadAngel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 124 answers that named LeadAngel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

leadangel.comYour site25

guideflow.com12

cal.com11

cognism.com11

croclub.com10

default.com10

improvado.io10

pipeline.zoominfo.com10

articsledge.com9

cleverly.co9

Ninety-two of the 117 domain citations in answers naming LeadAngel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

croclub.com/tools/best-lead-routing-software10

guideflow.com/blog/lead-routing-software10

improvado.io/blog/the-best-lead-management-software10

articsledge.com/post/lead-routing-software9

default.com/post/top-b2b-lead-follow-up-automation-software9

cleverly.co/blog/lead-routing-software8

leadangel.com/blog/abm/best-lead-routing-software8

cal.com/blog/lead-routing-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeadAngel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeadAngel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leadangel.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.