| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 21% | 2 of 104 | 20% | 55 | accepted challenger |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 4% | 11 of 151 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15% |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 52 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The gold standard for Salesforce-native environments... LeanData is the market leader. However, it requires experienced RevOps administrators to maintain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · scale prompt · first choice
“start by evaluating Chili Piper if your bottleneck is inbound conversion speed, or LeanData if your bottleneck is messy routing logic” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“LeanData | Enterprise, complex Salesforce environments | Lead-to-account matching, territories, ownership governance, audit depth” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · scale prompt · first choice
“prioritize Salesforce-native routing tools (such as *LeanData, Traction Complete, Kubaru,* or *Distribution Engine*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“here are the lead routing and management tools you should avoid or be cautious about... LeanData Common Issues: - Complex interface” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lead routing · negative prompt · hard negative
“trying to buy enterprise-level lead routing platforms like LeanData, Default, or full Chili Piper suites can be incredibly frustrating” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · hard negative
“LeanData / 6sense / ZoomInfo GTM Studio — Mid-five to six-figure contracts” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · budget prompt · hard negative
“1. LeanData (especially for HubSpot users) Why to avoid/caution:” Mistral Small · Lead routing · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 160 answers that named LeanData and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-eight of the 111 domain citations in answers naming LeanData came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeanData's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeanData, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leandata.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.