Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 81 → 103 of 103
4 categories · RankedLeanData
164Judge labels
48First choices
48Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
64% in Lead routing for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 111 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 32% of its 53 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LeanData →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business110 of 110
0%35 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market2 of 111
21%53 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 87
64%68 labels
endorsed leader
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LeanData for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 21% | 2 of 111 | 32% | 53 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 21% → 18%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 28 of 140 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 34 of 99 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 43% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 89 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LeanData held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 21% → 18%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 21% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 of 103, unchanged
Enterprise▲+12Since September 2026: 54% → 66%, +12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
66%from 54% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 1 pointRank 1 of 80, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 21% | 18% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 21% → 18%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 111, unchanged |
| Identity | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 28 of 140 |
| CRM data quality | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 99, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LeanData across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LeanData across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels20
Paraphrase34 labels17
Comparative31 labels20not counted in share
Budget-constrained16 labels5
Scale-constrained23 labels6
Negative26 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative164 labels in all, every segment counted; 48 of the 71 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“My default recommendation: LeanData—if your CRM is Salesforce and you need both dependable lead-to-account matching and flexible assignment.” GPT-6 Luna · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“LeanData * Best For: Enterprise sales organizations using Salesforce. ... most large companies add a tool like LeanData on top of it” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · comparative prompt · first choice
“If I had to pick one default recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company with meaningful routing complexity, it would be LeanData.” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For Salesforce users, LeanData and LeadAngel are top choices due to their deep integration and advanced routing capabilities.” Mistral Small · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid LeanData for now unless you are already approaching enterprise scale; its high cost and implementation time are generally unnecessary” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“LeanData is powerful but expensive/Salesforce-locked; great for enterprises, overkill (and risky if you're not all-in) for others.” Grok 4.20 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Salesforce-only and expensive to run... Steep learning curve, HubSpot integration issues, Routing errors in complex setups” Muse Glimmer 30B · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose LeanData only if you are closer to enterprise scale and can justify the cost and implementation complexity” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeanData, over the 164 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeanData was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LeanData, over the 164 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LeanData was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LeanData. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 158 of the 164 answers that named LeanData and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
leadangel.com80
leandata.comYour site74
guideflow.com68
prospeo.io61
default.com59
pipeline.zoominfo.com57
wonderchat.io52
martal.ca46
avoma.com43
blog.hubspot.com41
507 of the 581 domain citations in answers naming LeanData came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leandata.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LeanData takes 21% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leandata.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LeanData takes 21% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
2
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“leandata”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 50 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,226 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 367 · 55 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,618
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
21%
rank 2 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 48 across its categories
- Named in
- 164 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 158 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leandata.com
851
subdomains included
Content
766
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
23 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 655 | undated | ABM, CRM | ||
| Conference or event | 36 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 23 | undated | ABM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | undated | ABM | ||
| News or press | 14 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | undated | |||
| Case study | 7 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | undated |
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 6, 2026OpsStars 2026The InterContinental, San Francisco · hosted
- October 5, 2026OpsStars 2026The InterContinental, San Francisco · hosted
- September 17, 2026Uber Secures 43% Uplift in Conversions with AgentExchangeMoscone West, L1 Forest, AgentExchange Theater · spoke
- September 17, 2026AgentExchange GTM App Demo ShowcaseMoscone West, L1, AgentExchange Theater · spoke
- September 16, 2026How Autodesk Unified LeanData & Agentforce to Fuel GrowthMetreon AMC, L3, Theater 11 · spoke
- September 16, 2026Club6Tropisueño · attended
- September 15, 2026Club6Tropisueño · attended
As the event pages on leandata.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leandata.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ABM (11); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as LeanData
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LeanData; a claim can dispute any of them.
LeanData (with BookIt) 1Salesforce + LeanData 1
Follow LeanData
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LeanData is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LeanData is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered GTM That Works; Intelligent Go-To-Market Orchestration
- For
- B2B Teams; GTM leaders and practitioners
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2CCPAGDPR
- Hosting
- US
- Customers named
- UberPalo Alto NetworksSlackOutreach1mindAnthropicOpenAIBambooHR
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations
What LeanData's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leandata.com, trust.leandata.com, leandata.com/platform, leandata.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LeanData's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LeanData, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LeanData by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LeanData is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LeanData, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LeanData is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where LeanData is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideLeanData is among the products AI models recommend first in Lead routing and management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.