GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Default · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Default

59Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Lead routing for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 104 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 23 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Default for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Lead routing and managementSales2%9 of 10413%23accepted challenger
Meeting schedulingSales0%51 of 770%1under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 59%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Default yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Default across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash05016
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small03003
DeepSeek V4 Flash11002
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K203104
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd shortlist LeadAngel or Default” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“pass the actual distribution to a dedicated routing or scheduling layer (like *Chili Piper, RevenueHero,* or *Default*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · negative prompt · alternative
“Chili Piper or Default if the real problem is fast inbound handoff and meeting booking” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Default - Strong audit trails, availability-aware routing, good for RevOps teams” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“enterprise-level lead routing platforms like LeanData, Default, or full Chili Piper suites ... require five-figure annual contracts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · hard negative
“recent G2 reviews mention routing issues, “vaporware” AI features, and support that felt reactive rather than proactive. That’s a warning sign” GPT-5.4 mini · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Default has workflow/UX gripes” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Default, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Default was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Chili Piper53 of 598Not in the top three
LeanData46 of 5926Not in the top three
LeadAngel31 of 596Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub30 of 598Not in the top three
RevenueHero28 of 595Not in the top three
Kubaru24 of 593Not in the top three
Distribution Engine18 of 593Not in the top three
Pipedrive18 of 591Not in the top three
Traction Complete16 of 593Not in the top three
Salesforce Lead Assignment Rules16 of 591Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Default. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 59 answers that named Default and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

leadangel.com7
default.comYour site6
articsledge.com5
croclub.com5
guideflow.com5
marketbetter.ai5
cal.com4
cleverly.co4
improvado.io4
kubaru.io4

Forty-three of the forty-nine domain citations in answers naming Default came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Default

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Default; a claim can dispute any of them.
Default/MarketBetter 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Default's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Default, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at default.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.