Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 16 of 103
3 categories · RankedDefault
47Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Lead routing for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Default →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 110
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market8 of 111
2%16 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 87
2%17 labels
accepted challenger
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Default for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 2% | 8 of 111 | 0% | 16 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 0% | 18 of 58 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 37 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Default held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 14 of 103
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 13 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 8 of 111 |
| Scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 18 of 58 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 94, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Default across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Default across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Default is repeatedly recommended for mid-market inbound routing + scheduling automation.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Lead routing · direct prompt · first choice
“Positions itself around visual workflows that can combine routing with enrichment, qualification, scheduling, CRM updates, and fallbacks” GPT-6 Luna · Lead routing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Default if you want one platform that integrates easily to handle data enrichment, instantly qualifies forms, escalates leads” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Default has quickly become a highly recommended tool for mid-market B2B companies looking to consolidate their tech stack.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Default, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Default was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Default, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Default was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Default. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Default and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
default.comYour site34
leadangel.com27
guideflow.com26
prospeo.io17
leandata.com16
articsledge.com14
avoma.com13
blog.hubspot.com13
chilipiper.com13
kubaru.io13
152 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming Default came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
default.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Default takes 2% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
default.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Default takes 2% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“default”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 77,291 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,184 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,419 · 104 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,271
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 47 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 47 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on default.com
441
subdomains included
Content
239
counted in the table below
Documentation
167
Product · Integration
4 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 188 | 17 | 2026-09-03 | CRM, Enrichment | |
| Comparison | 31 | 8 | 2026-09-03 | CRM | |
| Case study | 15 | 0 | 2025-12-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-10 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-07-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-03Salesforce data cloud pricing blog
- 2026-09-03Hockeystack alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-02Automate data enrichment gtm stack blog
- 2026-09-02Agentforce data cloud blog
- 2026-09-02Top 7 RevOps automation tools with AI in 2026 blog
- 2026-09-01Hubspot data warehouse blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page default.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (11); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Default
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Default; a claim can dispute any of them.
Default (default.com) 1Default (formerly) 1Default/Knock AI 1
Follow Default
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Default is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Default is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI infrastructure for revenue teams. It unifies go-to-market data and lets agents turn plain-language requests into working systems for routing, scheduling, workflows, and reporting across the revenue stack.
- For
- revenue teams
- Price stated
- Growth: $1,250 per month; $15,000 per year, billed annually. Scale: $3,000 per month; $36,000 per year, billed annually. default.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 1250 default.com/pricing
- Customers named
- CortexBland AIPeople Data LabsFERMÀTProfoundNorthwind RoboticsNorthwind AnalyticsKestrel Freight
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Default's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: default.com, default.com/pricing, trust.default.com, default.com/product/lead-routing-software, default.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Default's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Default, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Default by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Default is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Default, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.