Small business▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 7 → 19 of 103
1 category · RankedKubaru
35Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Lead routing for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Kubaru →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business19 of 110
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market15 of 111
0%18 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise2 of 87
9%12 labels
accepted challenger
In lead routing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Kubaru for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 15 of 111 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Kubaru held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Lead routing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 13 of 103
Enterprise▼−7Since September 2026: 18% → 11%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
11%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 of 80, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Kubaru across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Kubaru across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels5
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Kubaru if: You want enterprise-grade Salesforce routing at the most predictable, affordable price point” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Kubaru is an excellent lightweight alternative built specifically for sales operations on Salesforce” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Distribution Engine (by NC Squared) or Kubaru ... excellent round-robin logic, weighted distributions” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · comparative prompt · alternative
“"Kubaru is a Salesforce-native assignment automation tool for leads, cases, and other records."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Lead routing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kubaru, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kubaru was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Kubaru, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kubaru was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kubaru. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Kubaru and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com26
leadangel.com25
kubaru.ioYour site23
prospeo.io19
leandata.com15
default.com14
wonderchat.io14
blog.hubspot.com13
martal.ca12
reform.app11
149 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Kubaru came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
kubaru.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kubaru takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.ShowHide
Search and answers
kubaru.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kubaru takes 0% of first choices and LeadAngel takes 26%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best lead routing and management tool”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 110 a month (“kubaru”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 467 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 224 · 16 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 124
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 15 of 111 in lead routing
Segment leader
26%
LeadAngel
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 35 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 35 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on kubaru.io
218
subdomains included
Content
65
counted in the table below
Documentation
111
Product · Integration
12 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 38 | 3 | 2026-07-06 | Enrichment | |
| Comparison | 21 | 7 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Case study | 5 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2023-05-16 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-07Distribution engine vs chili piper comparison
- 2026-08-07Distribution engine vs leandata comparison
- 2026-08-07Distribution engine vs q assign comparison
- 2026-08-07Leandata vs plauti comparison
- 2026-08-07Q assign vs chili piper comparison
- 2026-08-07Q assign vs leandata comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page kubaru.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Kubaru
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Kubaru is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Kubaru is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automated Lead and Case Assignment for Salesforce
- For
- Salesforce teams
- Price stated
- Kubaru is $20/user/month. kubaru.io
- Starting price
- 20 kubaru.io
- Free plan or trial
- Yes. Start a free trial any time from our AppExchange listing by clicking "Get It Now". The trial runs 30 days, includes every feature, and needs no credit card. kubaru.io
- Customers named
- OomaCongaExclaimerThe Loan StoreGenesysTrustpilotSATOLightspeed
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What Kubaru's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: kubaru.io, kubaru.io/pricing, kubaru.io/features/security, kubaru.io/features, kubaru.io/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kubaru's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kubaru, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kubaru by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Kubaru is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kubaru, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.