| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 10% | 3 of 71 | 13% | 54 | accepted challenger |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 5% | 6 of 104 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 17 of 103 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30% |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 61 of 81 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 19% |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 48 of 53 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 55% |
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 24 of 50 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24% |
| CRM data quality and deduplication | Revenue operations | 0% | 63 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34% |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 56 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39% |
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 39 of 53 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 29% |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 51 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20% |
| Sales commissions and incentive compensation | Revenue operations | 0% | 19 of 51 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25% |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 54 of 55 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Salesloft at 35% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with a free tier (HubSpot or Zoho) to test the waters. Both offer strong functionality at no cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CRM · budget prompt · first choice
“best for budget-conscious organizations that need basic workflow automation and contact distribution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a cheap, standard CRM with great built-in round-robin routing: Go with Zoho CRM.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice
“For most small businesses with limited budgets, Zoho CRM offers the best balance” Mistral Small · CRM · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“there are several marketing automation platforms that should be avoided or approached with caution. Some of the platforms mentioned include Zoho CRM, Salesforce, and HubSpot.” Llama 4 Maverick · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Zoho CRM: 300+ negative G2 reviews... Affordable but frustrating for growing teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Practitioners consistently warn against Zoho's native sales engagement features” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“complaining about email sync failures - Systemic reliability issues” MiniMax M2.5 · CRM · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 247 answers that named Zoho CRM and are not a share of its labels.
104 of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Zoho CRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho CRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho CRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zohocrm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.