| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 2% | 6 of 64 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 59% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 2% | 10 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 56 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 80 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 71 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead routing | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 111, unchanged |
| CRM | 4% | 3% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 of 64, unchanged |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 104, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 44 → 80 of 123 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 71 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Bigin is the gold standard. It was specifically built by Zoho to serve small businesses” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Option: Zoho Bigin” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Lead routing · budget prompt · first choice
“Best low-cost paid option: Zoho Bigin / Zoho CRM — among the cheapest entry points” GPT-5.4 mini · CRM · budget prompt · alternative
“Zoho Bigin offers the best balance of low cost and growth potential” Kimi K2 · CRM · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Scalability issues: Outgrowing forces migration (e.g., Zoho Bigin)” Grok 4.1 Fast · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 56 answers that named Bigin by Zoho and are not a share of its labels.
160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming Bigin by Zoho came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 145 | 1 | 2026-08-13 | CRM, Scheduling | |
| Comparison | 65 | 1 | 2026-07-07 | CRM | |
| Case study | 54 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 34 | undated | CRM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 1 | 2026-09-17 | CRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page bigin.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bigin by Zoho's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bigin by Zoho, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bigin by Zoho by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: