| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 13 of 64 | 20% | 10 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 18 of 111 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 25 of 72 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 25 of 94 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 48 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 85 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% | |
| Sales dialers and calling | Sales | 0% | 66 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CloudTalk at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 75 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 13 of 64 |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 18 of 111 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 72, unchanged |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 94, unchanged |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 71, unchanged |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 85 of 104, unchanged |
| Dialers | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 47 → 66 of 75 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 75 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Many teams do not realize their CRMs can handle basic territory and quota mapping out-of-the-box.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative
“a budget-friendly CRM-native option for teams that want built-in AI and workflow automation” Perplexity Sonar · ABM · budget prompt · alternative
“Flexible work‑OS approach | Monday Sales CRM | Customizable workflows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM · comparative prompt · alternative
“Monday CRM (Best for Customization) - Starts at $12/seat/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Field sales · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Limited features/automation depth, integration lags, no free plan, 3-seat minimum” Grok 4.20 · CRM · negative prompt · soft negative
“monday CRM | No true free; trial only” Grok 4.20 · CRM · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 63 answers that named monday CRM and are not a share of its labels.
124 of the 159 domain citations in answers naming monday CRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,598 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 189 | 0 | 2026-02-18 | ||
| Comparison | 169 | 5 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 7 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| News or press | 61 | 0 | 2026-06-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 53 | 3 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Conference or event | 51 | 5 | 2026-08-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 32 | 1 | 2026-07-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on monday.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page monday.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What monday CRM's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: monday.com, monday.com/pricing, trust.monday.com, monday.com/features/files, monday.com/w/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when monday CRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as monday CRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for monday CRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: