GTM AI Index
Index › Vendors › monday CRM · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

monday CRM

36Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in CRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 21 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business27 of 47
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 71
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named monday CRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CRMRevenue operations0%21 of 710%4under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%
Lead routing and managementSales0%20 of 1040%3under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%
Partner relationship managementPartner and channel0%34 of 500%2under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%59 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Customer data platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%39 of 590%1under 10 labels · led by Segment at 48%
Sales dialers and callingSales0%51 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Aloware at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for monday CRM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated monday CRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“monday CRM or HubSpot if you want a more all-in-one CRM-first setup with lighter routing needs” Perplexity Sonar · Lead routing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Monday CRM - Highly adaptable platform for managing partner data and workflows” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“monday CRM is a strong alternative because it bundles a built-in dialer” Perplexity Sonar · Dialers · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“$12/user/month | Visual workflow automation, simple routing recipes” Kimi K2 · Lead routing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as monday CRM, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and monday CRM was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pipedrive14 of 364Not in the top three
Zoho CRM14 of 361Not in the top three
HubSpot CRM13 of 365Not in the top three
Freshsales12 of 360Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub9 of 362Not in the top three
Salesforce Sales Cloud7 of 360Not in the top three
PandaDoc6 of 365Not in the top three
Less Annoying CRM6 of 360Not in the top three
QuoteWerks5 of 362Not in the top three
Chili Piper5 of 360Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named monday CRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 36 answers that named monday CRM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io3
forbes.com3
monday.comYour site3
blog.hubspot.com2
blog.salesflare.com2
cleverly.co2
croclub.com2
g2.com2
improvado.io2
learn.g2.com2

Twenty of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming monday CRM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

11x.ai/guides/ai-voice-agents-outbound-calling1
11x.ai/guides/sales-dialer-tools-b2b-sales-teams1
agiled.app/blog/best-crm-for-small-businesses1
allego.com/blog/best-sales-enablement-tools1
artisan.co/blog/best-outbound-dialer1
bigcontacts.com/blog/best-lead-distribution-software1
blog.hubspot.com/sales/crm-examples1
blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-tools-to-help-close-deals-list1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as monday CRM

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as monday CRM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Monday CRM 6

The company

monday.com is the company behind monday CRM.
Website
monday.com
Headquarters
Tel Aviv
Founded
2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when monday CRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as monday CRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at monday.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack