| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Revenue operations | 0% | 11 of 64 | 26% | 58 | criticized challenger | ▼−10Since September 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 31 of 94 | 36% | 14 | criticized challenger | |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 24 of 72 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 27 of 66 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 24 of 111 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 28 of 76 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 103 of 123 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 47 of 91 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 0% | 35 of 58 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 10% | 0% | ▼−10Since September 2026: 10% → 0%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 11 of 64 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 31 of 94, unchanged |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 73 → 24 of 72 |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 27 of 66 |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 50 → 24 of 111 |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 28 of 76 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 37 → 103 of 123 |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 91, unchanged |
| Scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 58, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Salesforce Sales Cloud is a strong competitor with a high score, and it's positioned for enterprise customization with AI-driven capabilities and a vast ecosystem” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for large enterprises needing complex customization and scalability... Salesforce leads with the most integrations” Mistral Small · CRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Market leader with ~20% global market share ... Choose Salesforce if you need maximum customization” Kimi K2 · CRM · comparative prompt · first choice
“Salesforce leads the way in this year's Forrester Wave” Muse Glimmer 30B · CRM · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Extremely expensive... Steep learning curve, complex setups, and overwhelming for field reps.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Field sales · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Salesforce unless you're an enterprise with dedicated admin resources.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · CRM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Salesforce represents a massive administrative burden... implementations commonly become bloated, confusing, and ultimately abandoned” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CRM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Caveat for Mid-Market: Be wary of the hidden costs. Mid-market companies often struggle with the complexity and implementation fees.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Field sales · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 275 of the 303 answers that named Salesforce Sales Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
470 of the 517 domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Sales Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Salesforce Sales Cloud's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesforce.com/sales/cloud, salesforce.com/crm/cloud-crm, salesforce.com/sales/demos/salesforce-pricing, salesforce.com/tw/editions-pricing/sales-cloud, salesforce.com/sales/demos/salesforce-products. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Sales Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Sales Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesforce Sales Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: