GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Highspot · September 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Highspot

338Judge labels
21First choices
151Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
20% in Sales enablement for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 81 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 49% of its 55 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In sales enablement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Highspot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales enablement and contentSales8%5 of 8149%55criticized challenger
Digital sales roomsSales0%37 of 5937%27criticized challenger
Sales coaching and trainingSales0%34 of 12433%18criticized challenger
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales0%68 of 75100%1under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Highspot yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Highspot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500617
GPT-5.4 mini23016
Gemini 3.5 Flash232714
Perplexity Sonar14139
Grok 4.1 Fast214310
Mistral Small02226
DeepSeek V4 Flash114713
Llama 4 Maverick01113
Qwen 3.7 Flash041611
Kimi K2110810
GLM 4.7 FlashX02226
MiniMax M2.502136

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct57 labels8
Paraphrase57 labels4
Comparative76 labels12not counted in share
Budget-constrained44 labels5
Scale-constrained33 labels4
Negative71 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative338 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 36 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need content management + analytics + coaching in one platform, start with Highspot or Seismic.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice
“Named a Leader in the inaugural 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant... Content discovery is the problem? → Highspot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice
“Large content library + AI search | Highspot | Superior content discovery and recommendations” Kimi K2 · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice
“Content-heavy? Highspot/Seismic. ... Gartner Leader (highest Ability to Execute)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales enablement · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid signing new multi-year contracts with Highspot, Seismic, Showpad, or Brainshark until post-integration roadmaps are clear” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales enablement · negative prompt · hard negative
“$50K+ annual minimums, $15K–$45K implementation fees, requires ongoing admin overhead. Better for 500+ employee companies.” Kimi K2 · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid signing new multi-year contracts with Highspot, Showpad, or Brainshark until post-integration roadmaps are clear” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales enablement · negative prompt · hard negative
“Probably avoid on a tight budget: enterprise-heavy platforms like Highspot or Seismic” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales enablement · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Highspot, over the 338 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Highspot was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Seismic290 of 33838Not in the top three
MindTickle221 of 33846Not in the top three
Showpad172 of 3387Not in the top three
Allego142 of 3385Not in the top three
Dock116 of 33823Not in the top three
Gong107 of 33815Not in the top three
Trumpet80 of 33820Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub73 of 33830Not in the top three
SalesHood72 of 33810Not in the top three
Spekit70 of 3387Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Highspot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 338 answers that named Highspot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mindtickle.com29
showpad.com28
learn.g2.com26
dock.us25
highspot.comYour site18
spekit.com18
alignedup.com15
g2.com13
salesmotion.io13
federicopresicci.com12

179 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming Highspot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Highspot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Highspot; a claim can dispute any of them.
Highspot (now Seismic) 1Highspot (now part of Seismic) 1Highspot by Seismic 1Seismic / Highspot (Merged) 1

The company

Highspot.
Website
highspot.com
Headquarters
Seattle, United States
Founded
2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Highspot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Highspot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at highspot.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack