Every category where a model named Dock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales enablement and content	Sales	19%	1 of 81	0%	28	accepted challenger
Digital sales rooms	Sales	6%	6 of 59	20%	45	accepted challenger
Sales coaching and training	Sales	2%	12 of 124	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by SalesHood at 27%
CPQ	Revenue operations	0%	22 of 73	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 62%
Digital adoption and onboarding	Customer	0%	22 of 58	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 29%
Customer education and LMS	Customer	0%	27 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dock yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	1	0	5
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	3	1	2	8
Perplexity Sonar	1	4	2	1	8
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	7	3	0	10
Mistral Small	2	4	1	1	8
DeepSeek V4 Flash	3	8	1	1	13
Llama 4 Maverick	0	4	1	0	5
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	3	1	1	6
Kimi K2	3	6	0	2	11
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	3	1	0	5
MiniMax M2.5	1	3	1	1	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct42 labels9

Paraphrase45 labels12

Comparative40 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained34 labels5

Scale-constrained15 labels1

Negative32 labels4not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative208 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 33 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Dock: Best for mid-market B2B teams that want to enable buyers and sellers with deal rooms, onboarding portals, CMS, and LMS in one platform—without enterprise bloat.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales enablement · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with HubSpot if you want an all-in-one solution, or Dock if you prefer something more focused on content management” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Dock is often cited as the most flexible platform... treats the sales room as a workspace that transitions seamlessly into onboarding” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · first choice

“or Dock if you're a smaller, fast-moving mid-market team (5–100 sellers) that wants capability without enterprise bloat or cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales enablement · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid platforms like Dock, GetAccept, or Highspot for a limited budget” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · budget prompt · hard negative

“Budget concerns - paid plans reportedly start around $350/month for 5 users” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid platforms like Dock ($350/month minimum)” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · budget prompt · hard negative

“Platforms like Dock are fantastic... but their Standard plan starts at a flat $350/month... this is a massive budget waste.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales rooms · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dock, over the 208 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dock was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Seismic116 of 20814Not in the top three

Highspot116 of 20811Not in the top three

Trumpet103 of 20826Not in the top three

Aligned98 of 20843Not in the top three

GetAccept91 of 2087Not in the top three

MindTickle76 of 2087Not in the top three

Flowla70 of 2088Not in the top three

Showpad65 of 2083Not in the top three

Allego59 of 2081Not in the top three

DealHub50 of 2082Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 208 answers that named Dock and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

mindtickle.com22

dock.usYour site20

learn.g2.com19

getaccept.com17

g2.com14

alignedup.com12

showpad.com12

flowla.com11

gartner.com11

hummingdeck.com11

129 of the 149 domain citations in answers naming Dock came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getaccept.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-software16

mindtickle.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-comparison-and-review16

dock.us/library/digital-sales-room-software15

showpad.com/blog/best-digital-sales-room-platforms-a-ranked-comparison-202612

dock.us/library/sales-enablement-software11

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-sales-rooms11

hummingdeck.com/blog/digital-sales-room-comparison-202611

learn.g2.com/best-digital-sales-room-software11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Dock

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dock; a claim can dispute any of them.

Dock/Mindtickle 1

The company

Dock.

Website: dock.us
Headquarters: San Francisco, United States
Founded: 2021

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dock.us is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.