| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 29% | 1 of 73 | 18% | 44 | accepted challenger | ▲+25Since September 2026: 6% → 31%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 16% | 3 of 72 | 0% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 2% | 7 of 104 | 5% | 40 | accepted challenger | |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 2% | 10 of 94 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 2% | 13 of 124 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital adoption and onboarding | Customer | 0% | 19 of 45 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| CPQ | Revenue operations | 0% | 62 of 66 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by DealHub at 57% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 50 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales rooms | 6% | 31% | ▲+25Since September 2026: 6% → 31%, +25 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 6 → 1 of 73 |
| Sales enablement | 19% | 17% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 19% → 17%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 3 of 72 |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 7 of 104, unchanged |
| Field sales | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 94, unchanged |
| Sales coaching | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 13 of 124 |
| Digital adoption | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 22 → 19 of 45 |
| CPQ | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 62 of 66 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 15 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 12 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Dock - Best for mid-market B2B teams that want to enable buyers and sellers with deal rooms, onboarding portals, CMS, and LMS in one platform—without enterprise bloat.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales enablement · direct prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms like Dock or Trumpet that offer a better balance of buyer experience, ease of adoption, and cost.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · first choice
“Dock is the top recommendation due to its balance of features, ease of use, and pricing tailored for mid-market teams” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider platforms with proven track records like: - Dock (bidirectional CRM integration, strong buyer experience)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales rooms · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“(specifically mentioned to avoid) ... "Avoid platforms like Dock"” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“"one of the safest picks in the category" ... "the tradeoff: limited customization is the top complaint [50 G2 mentions], and some teams hit integration friction with third-party CRMs."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
“some reviews advise avoiding it at certain budget levels, noting that paid plans start around $350/month for just 5 users” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · negative prompt · soft negative
“its published paid Standard plan starts at $350/month for five users—a much bigger jump if you need to upgrade” GPT-6 Luna · Sales rooms · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 307 of the 307 answers that named Dock and are not a share of its labels.
726 of the 901 domain citations in answers naming Dock came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 106 | 0 | 2025-05-23 | ||
| Case study | 32 | 1 | 2026-08-21 | ||
| Comparison | 24 | 0 | 2025-09-02 | ||
| Conference or event | 22 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 13 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 0 | 2024-11-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 7 | 0 | 2026-03-24 | ||
| Blog | 1 | undated |
Every page dock.us exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Dock's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: dock.us, dock.us/pricing, dock.us/security, dock.us/features/slack, dock.us/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dock by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Dock first in Digital sales rooms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Dock is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales enablement and content this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.