AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Sales rooms › Dock vs GetAccept
Digital sales rooms · October 2026 Edition

Dock vs GetAccept

Five of fourteen models named Dock first on the direct prompt; zero named GetAccept. Both were named by all fourteen models and Dock carries 44 labels and GetAccept 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Dock

accepted challenger

San Francisco, United States, founded 2021. Named in eight categories this edition.

GetAccept

accepted challenger

founded 2015. Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share29%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate18%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4448A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Dock reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trumpet was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Dock vs Aligned · Dock vs Trumpet · Dock vs DealHub DealRoom

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital sales rooms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DockFirst choices, of fourteen modelsGetAccept
Direct50
Paraphrase92
Comparative00
Budget-constrained121 against Dock · 1 against GetAccept
Scale-constrained00
Negative207 against Dock · 4 against GetAccept
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Dock and GetAccept were named in the same answer seventy-seven times, of the 307 answers naming Dock and the 191 naming GetAccept. In those answers GetAccept took the first choice two times and Dock twenty-one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Dock and GetAccept stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Dock GetAccept first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dock on the left and GetAccept on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Dock and GetAccept stood in it.

Dock first, GetAccept an alternative

5 of 14 modelsGetAccept was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDock alternatives: Aligned, Arrows, Flowla, GetAccept, Trumpet
Perplexity SonarDock, Trumpet alternatives: GetAccept
Mistral SmallDock, Trumpet alternatives: GetAccept
DeepSeek V4 FlashDock alternatives: Aligned, GetAccept, Guideflow, Trumpet
Kimi K2Dock, Trumpet alternatives: Aligned, DealHub DealRoom, GetAccept

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aligned alternatives: GetAccept, Spekit, Trumpet
GPT-5.4 miniTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, DealHub DealRoom, GetAccept
Grok 4.1 FastAligned alternatives: DealHub DealRoom, GetAccept, Trumpet
Llama 4 MaverickTrumpet alternatives: Aligned, GetAccept, Storylane
GLM 4.7 FlashXAligned alternatives: Dock, GetAccept, Trumpet
GPT-6 LunaTrumpet alternatives: Dock
Muse Glimmer 30BTrumpet alternatives: GetAccept, Showpad Shared Spaces

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashQwilr alternatives: Contxtus, Highspot, Loopio, PandaDoc
MiniMax M2.5Spekit, Trumpet alternatives: Aligned

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Dock leads by three points.
Dock6%#4 of 12
GetAccept3%#6 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Dock leads by twenty-two points.
Dock29%#1 of 10
GetAccept8%#4 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Dock leads by seven points.
Dock11%#5 of 11
GetAccept4%#8 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Dock

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“(specifically mentioned to avoid) ... "Avoid platforms like Dock"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“"one of the safest picks in the category" ... "the tradeoff: limited customization is the top complaint [50 G2 mentions], and some teams hit integration friction with third-party CRMs."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“some reviews advise avoiding it at certain budget levels, noting that paid plans start around $350/month for just 5 users” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize platforms like Dock or Trumpet that offer a better balance of buyer experience, ease of adoption, and cost.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Dock is the top recommendation due to its balance of features, ease of use, and pricing tailored for mid-market teams” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Consider platforms with proven track records like: - Dock (bidirectional CRM integration, strong buyer experience)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about GetAccept

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Avoid pricier ones like GetAccept ($49/user/mo min 5 seats) unless you need built-in e-sign/CPQ.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Multiple user complaints describe the platform as "filled with bugs and usability problems"” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“The safest choice is to avoid GetAccept (due to billing/trust issues)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you need a true digital sales room: Go with GetAccept at $25/user/month \u2013 it offers the most complete DSR experience” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose GetAccept if you need a complete sales workflow (content + signatures) for a fixed, reasonable monthly fee.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Dock or GetAccept... with GetAccept as a strong alternative depending on your specific needs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.