Zero of fourteen models named GetAccept first on the direct prompt; zero named DealHub DealRoom. GetAccept was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DealHub DealRoom by thirteen and GetAccept carries 48 labels and DealHub DealRoom 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
founded 2015. Named in five categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital sales rooms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GetAccept and DealHub DealRoom were named in the same answer sixty-one times, of the 191 answers naming GetAccept and the 81 naming DealHub DealRoom. In those answers DealHub DealRoom took the first choice one time and GetAccept three.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid pricier ones like GetAccept ($49/user/mo min 5 seats) unless you need built-in e-sign/CPQ.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Multiple user complaints describe the platform as "filled with bugs and usability problems"” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“The safest choice is to avoid GetAccept (due to billing/trust issues)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“If you need a true digital sales room: Go with GetAccept at $25/user/month \u2013 it offers the most complete DSR experience” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose GetAccept if you need a complete sales workflow (content + signatures) for a fixed, reasonable monthly fee.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Dock or GetAccept... with GetAccept as a strong alternative depending on your specific needs” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“DealHub (if not primarily needing CPQ) ... Over-Specialization ... may not be the right fit” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Heavier and more complex to implement; may feel over‑engineered for smaller mid‑market teams.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“Despite its high ratings, DealHub has several significant concerns” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would recommend DealHub as the primary choice” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Unifies collaboration, proposals, approvals, and workflows in one centralized deal room.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · alternative
“Stick to top-rated ones for safety: Trumpet ..., DealHub (strong workflows)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.