Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 of 60, unchanged
5 categories · RankedGetAccept
191Judge labels
11First choices
26Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Sales rooms for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 73 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 48 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of GetAccept →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 62
3%43 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 73
8%48 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise8 of 47
4%36 labels
accepted challenger
In sales rooms · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GetAccept for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 8% | 4 of 73 | 10% | 48 | accepted challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Proposal software | Revenue operations | 0% | 12 of 56 | 7% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contract lifecycle management and e-signature | Revenue operations | 0% | 20 of 63 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by PandaDoc at 23% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| RFP response software | Sales | 0% | 25 of 82 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25% | |
| Interactive demo platforms | Sales | 0% | 32 of 50 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Storylane at 31% |
Movement
Since September 2026, GetAccept held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales rooms · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
9%from 8% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 69
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 8 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLM | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 20 of 63 |
| Sales rooms | 8% | 9% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 73 |
| Proposals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 12 of 56 |
| RFP response | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 25 of 82, unchanged |
| Interactive demos | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 50, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GetAccept across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GetAccept across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct42 labels3
Paraphrase37 labels4
Comparative47 labelsNone
Budget-constrained23 labels4
Scale-constrained17 labelsNone
Negative25 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative191 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you need a true digital sales room: Go with GetAccept at $25/user/month \u2013 it offers the most complete DSR experience” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose GetAccept if you need a complete sales workflow (content + signatures) for a fixed, reasonable monthly fee.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · budget prompt · first choice
“Dock or GetAccept... with GetAccept as a strong alternative depending on your specific needs” Kimi K2 · Sales rooms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend GetAccept as a strong starting point for buyer engagement and deal room needs.” Grok 4.20 · Sales rooms · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid pricier ones like GetAccept ($49/user/mo min 5 seats) unless you need built-in e-sign/CPQ.” Grok 4.20 · Sales rooms · budget prompt · hard negative
“Multiple user complaints describe the platform as "filled with bugs and usability problems"” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“The safest choice is to avoid GetAccept (due to billing/trust issues)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why Avoid/Caution: Usability & Bugs ... Low Trust Scores” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GetAccept, over the 191 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GetAccept was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GetAccept, over the 191 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GetAccept was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GetAccept. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 189 of the 191 answers that named GetAccept and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
getaccept.comYour site130
mindtickle.com97
g2.com75
dock.us68
guideflow.com65
storylane.io64
alignedup.com61
learn.g2.com57
hummingdeck.com54
showpad.com51
592 of the 722 domain citations in answers naming GetAccept came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
getaccept.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GetAccept takes 8% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.ShowHide
Search and answers
getaccept.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, GetAccept takes 8% of first choices and Dock takes 29%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “digital sales room platform”
5
Position for “best digital sales room platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“getaccept”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,454 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,504 · 134 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,041
- Paid Google search
- 6 searches its ads show for, about 52 clicks and $4,087 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 73 in sales rooms
Segment leader
29%
Dock
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 191 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 189 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on getaccept.com
1,590
subdomains included
Content
605
counted in the table below
Documentation
364
Product · Integration
22 · 31
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 498 | 12 | 2026-09-25 | CRM, Proposals | |
| Case study | 45 | 0 | 2026-02-26 | ||
| News or press | 28 | 0 | 2024-09-23 | CPQ | |
| Comparison | 14 | 5 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 11 | 2 | 2026-08-26 | Proposals, CPQ | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2025-05-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | 0 | 2022-11-07 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-04-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Why your next deal needs a shared action plan blog
- 2026-09-22Ai sales automation use cases across b2b sales cycle blog
- 2026-09-21How digital sales rooms accelerate complex saas deals blog
- 2026-09-17Digital sales room benefits blog
- 2026-09-15Qwilr alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-10Why great deals lose momentum right when they should close blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page getaccept.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (18); 18 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow GetAccept
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GetAccept.ShowHide
The company
GetAccept.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- getaccept.com
- Founded
- 2015
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered Digital Sales Rooms & Proposal Software
- For
- B2B sales teams
- Price stated
- 0 getaccept.com
- Starting price
- 0 getaccept.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try GetAccept free for 14 days getaccept.com
- Integrations claimed
- 500 getaccept.com · 4 getaccept.com/product/cpq pages disagree
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2eIDASCCPA
- Hosting
- Global
- Customers named
- DealfrontLabatonSalesscreenScaleWiseSocialTalentGoodlordVainuVisit Linköping
What GetAccept's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: getaccept.com, getaccept.com/pricing, getaccept.com/security, getaccept.com/product/cpq, getaccept.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GetAccept's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GetAccept, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GetAccept by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GetAccept is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GetAccept, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.