Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 20 → 9 of 123
6 categories · RankedMindTickle
329Judge labels
46First choices
84Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
46% in Sales coaching for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 51 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MindTickle →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business9 of 128
4%35 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 124
24%51 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise1 of 83
46%61 labels
endorsed leader
In sales coaching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MindTickle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 24% | 1 of 124 | 18% | 51 | accepted challenger | ▲+14Since September 2026: 10% → 24%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 2% | 7 of 72 | 6% | 32 | accepted challenger | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 27 of 73 | 33% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 77 of 91 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 28 of 64 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% | |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 61 of 116 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
Movement
Since September 2026, MindTickle moved past the floor in one of six categories: Sales coaching, +14 points to 24%. It held within the floor in the other five.
Best category · Sales coaching · by segment
Mid-market▲+14Since September 2026: 10% → 24%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
24%from 10% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 3 → 1 of 118
Enterprise▲+4Since September 2026: 41% → 45%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
45%from 41% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 80, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 10% | 24% | ▲+14Since September 2026: 10% → 24%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 3 → 1 of 124 |
| Sales enablement | 4% | 2% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 of 72, unchanged |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 27 of 73 |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 77 of 91 |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 64, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MindTickle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MindTickle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct68 labels22
Paraphrase43 labels15
Comparative88 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained36 labels5
Scale-constrained37 labels4
Negative57 labels8not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative329 labels in all, every segment counted; 46 of the 67 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“### 1. Mindtickle - Best for: Enterprise revenue enablement ... For enterprise teams needing scale and security: Mindtickle, Highspot, or Seismic” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales rooms · comparative prompt · first choice
“Mindtickle is the strongest overall sales enablement platform for teams that want training, content, coaching, and conversation intelligence in one place.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales enablement · comparative prompt · first choice
“It's ranked #1 on G2 for Sales Training & Onboarding for 26 consecutive quarters and is cited as the platform with the best sales readiness and coaching.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales coaching · direct prompt · first choice
“Frequently cited as the most complete sales readiness platform... If you want a data‑driven, outcome‑oriented readiness platform: Mindtickle.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales coaching · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“described as a sales enablement/readiness platform where CI is only a feature, not the core product” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid, if budget is very limited ... Mindtickle and Gong ... less attractive for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales coaching · budget prompt · hard negative
“Mentioned as part of the "bloated, enterprise-level enablement platforms" to avoid” Mistral Small · Sales rooms · negative prompt · hard negative
“Mindtickle (~$92K/year average) ... cost-prohibitive for small budgets” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales coaching · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MindTickle, over the 329 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MindTickle was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MindTickle, over the 329 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MindTickle was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MindTickle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 320 of the 329 answers that named MindTickle and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
mindtickle.comYour site169
g2.com154
dock.us150
learn.g2.com126
prospeo.io82
spekit.com81
guideflow.com75
pitchmonster.io74
pipeline.zoominfo.com70
blog.hubspot.com69
881 of the 1,050 domain citations in answers naming MindTickle came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where MindTickle stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where MindTickle stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales coaching and training platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales coaching and training platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“mindtickle”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 60 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 4,413 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,674 · 90 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,720
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
24%
rank 1 of 124 in sales coaching
First choices
46
across its categories
- Named in
- 329 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 320 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mindtickle.com
830
subdomains included
Content
697
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
32 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 471 | 35 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 65 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 48 | 29 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Case study | 33 | 23 | 2026-07-10 | ||
| Comparison | 27 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 5 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 8 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-12 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29A new dawn for revenue enablement debuts at elevate26 blog
- 2026-09-28Ai coach blog
- 2026-09-28What are ai agents in revenue enablement why they matter blog
- 2026-09-28Best hyperbound competitors and alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-28Ai role play scenarios for technology sales reps blog
- 2026-09-28The future of sales ai guided selling explained blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mindtickle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as MindTickle
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MindTickle; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mindtickle 97
Follow MindTickle
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MindTickle is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MindTickle is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Sales Enablement & Revenue Enablement Platform
- For
- customer-facing teams
- Price stated
- Pricing depends on company size and team structure. Request a demo for a detailed breakdown. mindtickle.com/platform
- Starting price
- 0 mindtickle.com/platform
- Free plan or trial
- null mindtickle.com/platform
- Integrations claimed
- 100 mindtickle.com/platform
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022ISO 27701:2019Data Privacy Framework (DPF)ISO 22301:2019ISO 27017:2015ISO 27018:2019ISO 42001:2023
- Hosting
- United Stat...IrelandSwedenSingapore
- Customers named
- CiscoIntegrace healthJanssen IndiaMetricStreamSignifydUniphoreJuniper NetworksDarktrace
What MindTickle's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mindtickle.com, trust.mindtickle.com, mindtickle.com/platform, mindtickle.com/customer-stories, mindtickle.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MindTickle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MindTickle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MindTickle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MindTickle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MindTickle, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where MindTickle is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where MindTickle is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend MindTickle first in Sales coaching and training this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.