| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 35 of 124 | 35% | 23 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 70 of 72 | 75% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 85 → 35 of 124 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 72, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Strong for content and go-to-market enablement; training/coaching is part of a larger platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“Alternative: *Seismic* (Enterprise standard; includes a module called "Lessonly"...)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“Seismic emphasizes enterprise-grade content governance and workflow automation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“The Best All-In-One/Modern Solution: Seismic ... Seismic is a powerhouse.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Too heavy and costly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-grade "behemoths" often require dedicated, full-time admins... (like Seismic merging with Highspot and Showpad acquiring Bigtincan)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Both have received consistent criticism, particularly around: Steep learning curves and complex administration that slow adoption” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales enablement · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mid‑merger complexity, steep implementation, focus on content libraries over deep coaching” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales coaching · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 77 of the 84 answers that named Seismic Enablement Cloud and are not a share of its labels.
258 of the 258 domain citations in answers naming Seismic Enablement Cloud came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 751 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 194 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 145 | undated | |||
| Case study | 132 | undated | |||
| News or press | 68 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 36 | 0 | 2026-02-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 35 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 16 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-03-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated |
Every page seismic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Seismic Enablement Cloud's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: seismic.com, trust.seismic.com, seismic.com/platform, seismic.com/customer-stories, seismic.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Seismic Enablement Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Seismic Enablement Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Seismic Enablement Cloud by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: