Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 76 → 12 of 63
ZoomInfo · 11 categories · RankedChorus by ZoomInfo
266Judge labels
1First choices
105Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
11Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Conversation intel for small business buyers
Rank 14 of 91 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 36% of its 47 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Chorus by ZoomInfo →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business12 of 66
2%45 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market14 of 91
0%47 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise15 of 96
0%51 labels
accepted challenger
In conversation intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chorus by ZoomInfo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 14 of 91 | 36% | 47 | criticized challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 21 of 124 | 20% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 71 of 76 | 40% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 105 of 116 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 32 of 66 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 56 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% | |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 55 of 142 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 90 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 48 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 64 of 64 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% | |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 56 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chorus by ZoomInfo held within the floor in all eleven categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Conversation intel · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 6 → 12 of 87
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 14 of 91
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 21 of 124 |
| Conversation intel | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 6 → 14 of 91 |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 71 of 76 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 105 of 116, unchanged |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 66, unchanged |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 86, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 142, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 172, unchanged |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 48 of 72 |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 64, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 56 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chorus by ZoomInfo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chorus by ZoomInfo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct50 labelsNone
Paraphrase27 labels1
Comparative68 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labelsNone
Scale-constrained42 labelsNone
Negative60 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative266 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Meeting-centric platform aimed at mid-market and enterprise revenue teams, so it is strong on deal and pipeline analytics and weak on phone calls placed through a VoIP dialler.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversation intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Adds “GTM Context Graph” – ties call moments to deal context ... Strong for enterprise teams needing integrated deal intelligence.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“Chorus by ZoomInfo excels with GTM Context Graph and conversation intelligence, best suited for enterprise revenue teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“best if your company already uses ZoomInfo heavily and you want conversation intelligence tied to contact/company data” GPT-5.4 mini · Conversation intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“ZoomInfo contracts are notorious for automatic multi-year renewals ... do not sign until you get the exact exit, cancellation, and non-auto-renewal clauses in writing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“"Technological stagnation: Widely described as 'has not innovated at all since 2022' following ZoomInfo acquisition"; "Poor product reputation"; "very poor product"}” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales coaching · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should immediately bypass enterprise-level conversation intelligence (CI) giants like Gong and Chorus by ZoomInfo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Conversation intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“not leaderboard/competition platforms. Different category entirely.” Kimi K2 · Sales gamification · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chorus by ZoomInfo, over the 266 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chorus by ZoomInfo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chorus by ZoomInfo, over the 266 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chorus by ZoomInfo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chorus by ZoomInfo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 239 of the 266 answers that named Chorus by ZoomInfo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.comYour site121
cirrusinsight.com98
cloudtalk.io90
avoma.com82
g2.com82
learn.g2.com65
marketintelligencetools.com65
blog.hubspot.com55
prospeo.io54
coffee.ai51
642 of the 763 domain citations in answers naming Chorus by ZoomInfo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
zoominfo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chorus by ZoomInfo takes 0% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
zoominfo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chorus by ZoomInfo takes 0% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“chorus by zoominfo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 15 a month
- Its company's site
- zoominfo.com shared with ZoomInfo's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,376,738 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,619,653 · 27,435 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 43,935
- Paid Google search
- 17 searches its ads show for, about 96 clicks and $1,140 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 14 of 91 in conversation intel
Segment leader
41%
Avoma
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 266 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 239 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Chorus by ZoomInfo
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Chorus by ZoomInfo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Chorus 24Chorus.ai 10Chorus (by ZoomInfo) 6Chorus (ZoomInfo) 5Chorus.ai (by ZoomInfo) 4ZoomInfo Chorus 4Chorus.ai (now part of ZoomInfo) 2Chorus/ZoomInfo 2Chorus (now Chorus by ZoomInfo) 1Chorus (now Zoo/ZoomInfo) 1Chorus (now part of ZoomInfo) 1Chorus.ai (ZoomInfo) 1Chorus.ai / Chorus by ZoomInfo 1Gong/Chorus 1ZoomInfo + Chorus 1ZoomInfo / Chorus by ZoomInfo Engage 1
Follow Chorus by ZoomInfo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind Chorus by ZoomInfo.ShowHide
The company
ZoomInfo is the company behind Chorus by ZoomInfo.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- zoominfo.com
- Headquarters
- Vancouver, Washington, United States
- Founded
- 2000
- Ownership
- Public, GTM on Nasdaq
- Also from ZoomInfo
- ZoomInfo + Intent Add-on, ZoomInfo Chat, ZoomInfo Copilot, ZoomInfo Copilot Dialer, ZoomInfo Engage, ZoomInfo GTM Studio, ZoomInfo GTM Workspace, ZoomInfo Marketing and 11 more
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Conversation intelligence
- For
- We connect sellers and marketers with their next customer and recruiters with their next hire.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Chorus by ZoomInfo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: zoominfo.com, trust.zoominfo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chorus by ZoomInfo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chorus by ZoomInfo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chorus by ZoomInfo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chorus by ZoomInfo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chorus by ZoomInfo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.