Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 25% → 28%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
28%from 25% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 2 of 63, unchanged
5 categories · RankedFireflies.ai
119Judge labels
28First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
32% in Conversation intel for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 91 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 36 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Fireflies.ai →By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
Small business1 of 66
32%61 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market2 of 91
16%36 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise93 of 96
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In conversation intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Fireflies.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 16% | 2 of 91 | 11% | 36 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 40 of 124 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 0% | 36 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43% | |
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 0% | 50 of 58 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 58 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Fireflies.ai held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Conversation intel · by segment
Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 4 → 2 of 87
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 89 of 91
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversation intel | 9% | 14% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 14%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 2 of 91 |
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 33 → 40 of 124 |
| Call tracking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 63, unchanged |
| Scheduling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 50 of 58, unchanged |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 58 of 76 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Fireflies.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Fireflies.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels5
Paraphrase13 labels2
Comparative26 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained33 labels19
Scale-constrained11 labels2
Negative22 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative119 labels in all, every segment counted; 28 of the 41 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall budget choice: Fireflies.ai — it has the lowest paid pricing in the results at $10/user/month annually” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with Fireflies.ai — it's the cheapest way to get real conversation intelligence with a solid free tier to test.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited-budget companies, Fireflies.ai gives the widest feature set for the lowest published price” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Fireflies is best for small to mid-size teams that want fast, affordable recording and CRM autofill” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Documented legal risk: Fireflies.ai and automatic voice capture ... alleges biometric privacy violations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Otter.ai and Fireflies process meeting data on US servers, creating GDPR Article 44 cross-border data transfer risks” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Scheduling · negative prompt · soft negative
“Great starter for small teams, but lacks B2B sales depth (e.g., weak on coaching patterns).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Conversation intel · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Reviewers frequently cite a failure rate where the bot simply does not join the meeting” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversation intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fireflies.ai, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fireflies.ai was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Fireflies.ai, over the 119 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fireflies.ai was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fireflies.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 119 answers that named Fireflies.ai and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cirrusinsight.com60
cloudtalk.io58
avoma.com49
marketintelligencetools.com40
pipeline.zoominfo.com39
fireflies.aiYour site38
coffee.ai29
learn.g2.com29
blog.hubspot.com26
g2.com26
356 of the 394 domain citations in answers naming Fireflies.ai came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
fireflies.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fireflies.ai takes 16% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
fireflies.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Fireflies.ai takes 16% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 22,200 a month (“fireflies.ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 193 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 69,005 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 13,471 · 329 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 12,159
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
16%
rank 2 of 91 in conversation intel
Segment leader
41%
Avoma
- First choices
- 28 across its categories
- Named in
- 119 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 116 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on fireflies.ai
1,854
subdomains included
Content
931
counted in the table below
Documentation
104
Product · Integration
15 · 72
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 812 | 45 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 56 | 8 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 23 | 2 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Podcast or video | 20 | 0 | 2024-03-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 9 | 0 | 2025-12-23 | ||
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2021-05-31 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 0 | 2024-04-30 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 0 | 2026-06-18 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Google meet games blog
- 2026-09-27How to record whatsapp calls blog
- 2026-09-22Is it illegal to record a conversation blog
- 2026-09-22Are ai notetakers safe blog
- 2026-09-22Ai notetaker for therapists blog
- 2026-09-16Fathom vs granola comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page fireflies.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Fireflies.ai
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fireflies.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.
Fireflies 10Fireflies.ai Business 1
Follow Fireflies.ai
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Fireflies.ai is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Fireflies.ai is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 AI Teammate for Meetings, Email, Chat & CRM
- For
- teams
- Price stated
- Free; Pro; Business; Enterprise fireflies.ai/pricing
- Starting price
- $0 fireflies.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Fireflies For Free fireflies.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 100 fireflies.ai/product/mobile
- Certifications
- GDPRSOC 2 Type IIHIPAA CompliantHIPAA complianceSOC2HIPAA
- Customers named
- PR LabsFlockClaraPhylloPRLabsCyberBytesBradoSlack
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Fireflies.ai's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: fireflies.ai, fireflies.ai/pricing, trust.fireflies.ai, fireflies.ai/product/mobile, fireflies.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fireflies.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fireflies.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fireflies.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Fireflies.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fireflies.ai, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Fireflies.ai is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Fireflies.ai is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideFireflies.ai is among the products AI models recommend first in Conversational intelligence and call recording this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.