AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Conversation intel › Avoma vs Fireflies.ai
Conversational intelligence and call recording · October 2026 Edition

Avoma vs Fireflies.ai

Ten of fourteen models named Avoma first on the direct prompt; zero named Fireflies.ai. Both were named by all fourteen models and Avoma carries 52 labels and Fireflies.ai 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Avoma

endorsed leader

Named in four categories this edition.

Fireflies.ai

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

First-choice share41%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels5236A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Avoma reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Jiminny was named alongside these two in eight of the fourteen direct answers. Avoma vs Gong · Avoma vs Jiminny · Avoma vs Fathom

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AvomaFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFireflies.ai
Direct100
Paraphrase901 against Fireflies.ai
Comparative00
Budget-constrained08
Scale-constrained101 against Avoma · 1 against Fireflies.ai
Negative001 against Avoma · 2 against Fireflies.ai
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Avoma and Fireflies.ai were named in the same answer seventy-nine times, of the 234 answers naming Avoma and the 119 naming Fireflies.ai. In those answers Fireflies.ai took the first choice twenty-four times and Avoma nineteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Avoma and Fireflies.ai stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Avoma Fireflies.ai first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Avoma on the left and Fireflies.ai on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Avoma and Fireflies.ai stood in it.

Avoma first, Fireflies.ai an alternative

10 of 14 modelsFireflies.ai was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Jiminny
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Fathom, HubSpot Sales Hub, Jiminny, Outreach Kaia
Grok 4.20Avoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Jiminny
Mistral SmallAvoma, Insight7 alternatives: Fireflies.ai, Gong, RingEX
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Jiminny
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma, Grain
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, ZIG, tl;dv
Kimi K2Avoma alternatives: Fathom, Jiminny, tl;dv
GLM 4.7 FlashXAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, Jiminny
Muse Glimmer 30BAvoma alternatives: Cirrus Insight, CloudTalk, Fireflies.ai, Jiminny

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashJiminny alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Gong, Outreach Kaia, Salesloft Conversations
GPT-6 LunaGong alternatives: Avoma, Clari Copilot, HubSpot's built-in CI

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Revenue.io, Salesloft Conversations
MiniMax M2.5Gong alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, HubSpot Sales Hub, Insight7, Salesloft Conversations

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fireflies.ai leads by eight points.
Fireflies.ai32%#1 of 11
Avoma24%#3 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Avoma leads at mid-market.
Avoma41%#1 of 10
Fireflies.ai16%#2 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Avoma leads by four points.
Avoma4%#2 of 9
Fireflies.ai0%#9 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Avoma

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“The headline price covers meeting transcription only, which may not align with broader needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Affordable, good for SMBs transitioning to mid-market.” Mistral Small · scale prompt · soft negative
“The best conversation intelligence and call recording platform for a mid-market B2B company is likely to be Avoma, Grain, or other AI-native conversation intelligence tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Avoma and Insight7 are top choices due to their affordability, ease of use, and strong feature sets tailored to mid-market needs” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Avoma offers the best balance of features, pricing transparency, and scalability” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fireflies.ai

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Documented legal risk: Fireflies.ai and automatic voice capture ... alleges biometric privacy violations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Great starter for small teams, but lacks B2B sales depth (e.g., weak on coaching patterns).” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Reviewers frequently cite a failure rate where the bot simply does not join the meeting” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best overall budget choice: Fireflies.ai — it has the lowest paid pricing in the results at $10/user/month annually” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with Fireflies.ai — it's the cheapest way to get real conversation intelligence with a solid free tier to test.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited-budget companies, Fireflies.ai gives the widest feature set for the lowest published price” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.