Zero of fourteen models named Fireflies.ai first on the direct prompt; three named Gong. Both were named by all fourteen models and Fireflies.ai carries 36 labels and Gong 63, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
By Gong.io, Ramat Gan, Israel, founded 2015. Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Fireflies.ai and Gong were named in the same answer ninety-four times, of the 119 answers naming Fireflies.ai and the 578 naming Gong. In those answers Gong took the first choice thirteen times and Fireflies.ai twenty-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Documented legal risk: Fireflies.ai and automatic voice capture ... alleges biometric privacy violations under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Great starter for small teams, but lacks B2B sales depth (e.g., weak on coaching patterns).” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Reviewers frequently cite a failure rate where the bot simply does not join the meeting” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Best overall budget choice: Fireflies.ai — it has the lowest paid pricing in the results at $10/user/month annually” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Go with Fireflies.ai — it's the cheapest way to get real conversation intelligence with a solid free tier to test.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For most limited-budget companies, Fireflies.ai gives the widest feature set for the lowest published price” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“you should immediately bypass enterprise-level conversation intelligence (CI) giants like Gong and Chorus by ZoomInfo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gong.io — The Most Expensive and Complicated Option ... Pricing transparency issues (major red flag)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Gong is widely considered the market leader in Revenue Intelligence... If you have the budget ($1k-$1.5k/user/month) and want rigorous sales optimization, this is the one.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The market-leading conversation intelligence platform focused on revenue analytics... For large sales teams needing deep revenue intelligence: Gong or Clari Copilot.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.