GTM AI Index
Index Sales Conversation intel › Gong vs Jiminny
Conversational intelligence and call recording · September 2026 Edition

Gong vs Jiminny

Two of twelve models named Gong first on the direct prompt; one named Jiminny. Gong was named by twelve of the twelve models and Jiminny by eight and Gong carries 55 labels and Jiminny 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Gong

criticized challenger

By Gong.io, Ramat Gan, Israel, founded 2015. Named in eight categories this edition.

Jiminny

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share13%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate40%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels5522A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Gong reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Avoma was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Avoma vs Gong · Avoma vs Jiminny · Fathom vs Gong

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
GongFirst choices, of twelve modelsJiminny
Direct215 against Gong
Paraphrase216 against Gong
Comparative100
Budget-constrained006 against Gong
Scale-constrained211 against Gong
Negative104 against Gong
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Gong and Jiminny stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Gong Jiminny first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Gong on the left and Jiminny on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Gong and Jiminny stood in it.

Gong first, Jiminny not the choice

2 of 12 modelsJiminny was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Salesloft Conversations
Grok 4.1 FastGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Fathom

Jiminny first, Gong not the choice

1 of 12 modelsGong was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashAvoma, Jiminny alternatives: Airspeed, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Airspeed, Clari Copilot, Gong, Jiminny
Mistral SmallAvoma alternatives: Coffee, Jiminny
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Fireflies.ai, Jiminny
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma alternatives: Gong, ZIG
Kimi K2Avoma alternatives: Clari Copilot, Fathom, Jiminny
GLM 4.7 FlashXAvoma alternatives: Fathom, Jiminny
MiniMax M2.5Avoma alternatives: Gong

Neither was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Airspeed, Clari Copilot, HubSpot's CI
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Gong0%#11 of 11
Jiminny0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Gong leads by seven points.
Gong13%#3 of 12
Jiminny7%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Gong leads by seventy-four points.
Gong74%#1 of 13
Jiminny0%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Gong

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“you should generally steer clear of enterprise conversation intelligence (CI) giants like Gong or Chorus (ZoomInfo)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Mid-Market ... typically over-built and over-budget below enterprise scale” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Category Leaders (Revenue & Deal Intelligence): *Gong.io* and *Chorus.ai (by ZoomInfo)*. Best for: Highly sophisticated sales teams focused on deal forecasting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jiminny

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“start a trial of Avoma ... or Jiminny (if your primary concern is coaching reps)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“That's why Jiminny and Avoma tend to be unusually good fits at this scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Recommended: Jiminny or Avoma for Mid-Sized B2B Companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.