Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 77 → 63 of 63
Gong · 14 categories · RankedGong
578Judge labels
62First choices
252Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
14Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
69% in Conversation intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 91 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 49% of its 63 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Gong →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business66 of 66
0%62 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market3 of 91
14%63 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 96
69%69 labels
endorsed leader
In conversation intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gong for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 14% | 3 of 91 | 49% | 63 | criticized challenger | ▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 12% | 3 of 76 | 35% | 63 | criticized challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 6% | 6 of 124 | 30% | 40 | criticized challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 14 of 123 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 32 of 116 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Contact center quality assurance | Customer | 0% | 76 of 81 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28% | |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 22 of 94 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 57 of 64 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% | |
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 0% | 71 of 77 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 0% | 26 of 63 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43% | |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 62 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% | |
| Dashboards and data visualization | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 26 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power BI at 52% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 64 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 33 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gong held within the floor in all fourteen categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Conversation intel · by segment
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
14%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 3 of 87, unchanged
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 74% → 70%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
70%from 74% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 91, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 10% | 7% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 6 of 124 |
| Revenue intel | 9% | 12% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 76 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 123, unchanged |
| Conversation intel | 13% | 14% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 13% → 14%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 91, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 116, unchanged |
| Contact center QA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 76 of 81, unchanged |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 22 of 94, unchanged |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 64, unchanged |
| AI SDR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 61 → 71 of 77 |
| Call tracking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 63, unchanged |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 86, unchanged |
| BI & dashboards | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 26 of 52, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 64 of 172, unchanged |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 33 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gong across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gong across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 16 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 11 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 17 |
| Mistral Small | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 4 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 13 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 18 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 16 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct128 labels31
Paraphrase68 labels18
Comparative127 labels63not counted in share
Budget-constrained65 labels2
Scale-constrained84 labels11
Negative106 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative578 labels in all, every segment counted; 62 of the 126 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Gong 🏆 ... Differentiator: The deepest after-the-call analytics on the market with behavioral benchmarking and revenue intelligence. Named a Leader in Gartner's 2025 Magic Quadrant.” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · first choice
“Gong pioneered the category by automatically recording and transcribing sales calls... Best For: Organizations prioritizing deep qualitative analysis of sales conversations and rep coaching.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“Gong is widely considered the market leader in Revenue Intelligence... If you have the budget ($1k-$1.5k/user/month) and want rigorous sales optimization, this is the one.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversation intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The market-leading conversation intelligence platform focused on revenue analytics... For large sales teams needing deep revenue intelligence: Gong or Clari Copilot.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Conversation intel · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you should immediately bypass enterprise-level conversation intelligence (CI) giants like Gong and Chorus by ZoomInfo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Conversation intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Gong if your team is under 15\u201320 reps or if you lack a dedicated Revenue Operations (RevOps) professional” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid (Too Expensive for Limited Budgets) ... Enterprise-focused with mandatory platform fees” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Gong.io — The Most Expensive and Complicated Option ... Pricing transparency issues (major red flag)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong, over the 578 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong, over the 578 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gong. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 534 of the 578 answers that named Gong and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com228
avoma.com186
g2.com174
cirrusinsight.com150
learn.g2.com130
cloudtalk.io128
blog.hubspot.com116
guideflow.com111
prospeo.io103
demandbase.com92
1,418 of the 1,418 domain citations in answers naming Gong came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gong.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Gong takes 14% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gong.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Gong takes 14% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
4
Position for “best conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
3
- Searches for its name, Google
- 74,000 a month (“gong”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13,361 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 52,787 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,950 · 483 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,703
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $1,556 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
14%
rank 3 of 91 in conversation intel
Segment leader
41%
Avoma
- First choices
- 62 across its categories
- Named in
- 578 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 534 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on gong.io
2,138
subdomains included
Content
1,757
counted in the table below
Documentation
5
Product · Integration
116 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 638 | 12 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 500 | 0 | 2023-10-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 173 | undated | |||
| News or press | 153 | 1 | 2026-07-01 | ||
| Case study | 138 | 0 | 2018-08-16 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 98 | 9 | 2026-10-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 38 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 11 | 0 | 2026-02-13 | ||
| Comparison | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2019-11-13 |
Most recent
- 2026-10-22The new sdr edge when everyone s outbound sounds the same your coaching is what s left webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-06Live product tour of gong webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-17Ai prospecting needs better data blog
- 2026-09-15Ai post sales operating model blog
- 2026-09-14How Practice Operations Technology vendors should leverage AI across the revenue lifecycle blog
- 2026-09-02Live product tour of gong forecast webinar or virtual event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page gong.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Gong
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gong; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gong.io 5Gong (Gong Forecast) 1Gong (Revenue AI OS) 1Gong/Chorus 1
Follow Gong
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gong.io is the company behind Gong.ShowHide
The company
Gong.io is the company behind Gong.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- gong.io
- Headquarters
- Ramat Gan, Israel
- Founded
- 2015
- Also from Gong
- Gong Enable, Gong Engage, Gong Forecast
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 AI OS for Revenue Teams
- For
- entire GTM organization
- Price stated
- Gong’s pricing model depends on a few factors specific to your team. Licenses are priced per user. There is a platform fee based on the number of users supported. You can integrate your existing tech stack for free. gong.io/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 300 gong.io/platform
- Certifications
- CSA STARCSA STAR Level 1EU-US DPFISO/IEC 27001ISO/IEC 27017:2015ISO/IEC 27018:2019ISO/IEC 27701ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Customers named
- AnthropicADPHubSpotLinkedInUber for BusinessSprout SocialSurveyMonkeyFrontline Education
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Gong's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gong.io, gong.io/pricing, trust.gong.io, gong.io/platform, gong.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gong's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gong, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gong by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gong is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gong, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Gong is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Gong is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideConversational intelligence and call recording
Gong is among the products AI models recommend first in Conversational intelligence and call recording this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Revenue intelligence and forecasting
Gong is among the products AI models recommend first in Revenue intelligence and forecasting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.