Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 45 → 43 of 48
Gong · 2 categories · RankedGong Engage
32Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales engagement for enterprise buyers
Rank 18 of 66 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business43 of 49
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 66
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise7 of 45
0%18 labels
accepted challenger
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Gong Engage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 18 of 66 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 73 of 76 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Gong Engage held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales engagement · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 of 62, unchanged
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 7 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 of 66, unchanged |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 73 of 76, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Gong Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Gong Engage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Team focused on call analysis and coaching: → Gong, with Gong Engage for sequencing if needed.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
“Choose Gong Engage if you are already using Gong for call recording” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
“its appeal is strongest when a team already uses Gong” GPT-6 Luna · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · alternative
“Gong (if coaching-heavy)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales engagement · scale prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“feels "still in beta," with bugs, weird UX decisions, and a general lack of polish” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“the engagement side often feels bolted-on rather than purpose-built” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong Engage, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong Engage was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Gong Engage, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gong Engage was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gong Engage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 30 of the 32 answers that named Gong Engage and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
resources.rework.com19
pipeline.zoominfo.com17
blog.hubspot.com11
revenuegrid.com11
salesforge.ai10
g2.com9
outreach.ai9
amplemarket.com8
salesforce.com8
salesloft.com8
110 of the 110 domain citations in answers naming Gong Engage came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
gong.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gong Engage takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
gong.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gong Engage takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“gong engage”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 13 a month
- Its company's site
- gong.io shared with Gong's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 52,787 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,950 · 483 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,703
- Paid Google search
- 10 searches its ads show for, about 67 clicks and $1,556 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 32 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 30 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Gong Engage
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gong Engage; a claim can dispute any of them.
Gong 4
Follow Gong Engage
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Gong.io is the company behind Gong Engage.ShowHide
The company
Gong.io is the company behind Gong Engage.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- gong.io
- Headquarters
- Ramat Gan, Israel
- Founded
- 2015
- Also from Gong
- Gong, Gong Enable, Gong Forecast
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Personalize outreach and automate follow-ups
- For
- ambitious revenue teams
- Free plan or trial
- tailored demos and pilots for qualified revenue teams gong.io/sales-engagement-platform
- Hosting
- region-specific data centers
- Customers named
- GoogleUpworkDemandScienceNasdaqSurveyMonkeyHST PathwaysClearChoice Dental Implant CentersEdgePetrol
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications
What Gong Engage's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: gong.io/sales-engagement-platform, academy.gong.io/courses/engage-at-a-glance, academy.gong.io/learning-paths/gong-engage-ae, academy.gong.io/courses/engage-flow-analytics, academy.gong.io/courses/sdrs-ready-set-engage. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gong Engage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gong Engage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gong Engage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Gong Engage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gong Engage, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.