Salesloft

Named in 33 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 13 first choices, 10 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

48% in Sales engagement

Rank 1 of 32 products named in sales engagement platforms, criticized default. 4 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 33 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesloft. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales engagement platforms	Sales	48%	1 of 32	30%	33	criticized default

By model

How each model treated Salesloft across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	4	0	0	2	6
Claude Opus 4.8	3	0	1	2	6
GPT-6 Astra	3	1	0	1	5
GPT-5.6 Sol	4	0	0	1	5
Gemini 3.1 Pro	3	1	0	2	6
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	1	1	2	5

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Outreach or Salesloft: Independent enterprise platforms when sequencing, administration, and complex outbound operations are central.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Sales engagement · scale prompt · first choice

“Outreach and Salesloft are consistently positioned as the two dominant, enterprise-grade platforms” Claude Opus 4.8 · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice

“My general recommendation for a typical mid-market B2B SaaS company: start with Salesloft” Claude Opus 4.8 · Sales engagement · direct prompt · first choice

“compare a dedicated platform such as Outreach or Salesloft against your CRM’s native option” GPT-6 Astra · Sales engagement · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Outreach and Salesloft if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Sales engagement · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms like *Outreach*, *Salesloft*, or *Groove*.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Sales engagement · budget prompt · hard negative

“Attackers stole OAuth tokens for Drift customers' technology integrations... The broader lesson isn't "avoid Salesloft" — it's that the attack exposed the systemic risk” Claude Opus 5 · Sales engagement · negative prompt · soft negative

“If flexibility matters. Its published agreement generally makes fees non-refundable and non-cancelable... Salesloft deserves an additional security review” GPT-6 Astra · Sales engagement · negative prompt · soft negative

Names read as Salesloft

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesloft; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesloft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.