| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 25% | 2 of 66 | 27% | 64 | criticized challenger | ▼−15Since September 2026: 35% → 21%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 19 of 76 | 21% | 19 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 29 of 72 | 38% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 18 of 52 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 63 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43% | |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 77 of 94 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 39 of 116 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 66 of 73 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 54 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 69 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13% | |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 0% | 105 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% | |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales gamification | Sales | 0% | 47 of 64 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31% | |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 104 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 35% | 21% | ▼−15Since September 2026: 35% → 21%, −15 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 1 → 2 of 66 |
| Revenue intel | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 19 of 76 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 78 → 29 of 72 |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 20 → 18 of 52 |
| Call tracking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 63, unchanged |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 77 of 94, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 116, unchanged |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 55 → 66 of 73 |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 60, unchanged |
| Email deliverability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 105 of 110, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 37 of 66, unchanged |
| Sales gamification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 64, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 104 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-sized B2B companies scaling reps quickly, Salesloft is the commonly recommended balance of engagement, coaching and revenue intelligence.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales engagement · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best sales engagement platforms for mid-market B2B companies are generally considered to be Salesloft, Apollo, and Outreach” Mistral Small · Sales engagement · direct prompt · first choice
“the best all-around choice is usually Salesloft if you want a dedicated sales engagement platform built for mid-market teams” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales engagement · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Salesloft or Outreach if you are an enterprise VP of Sales using Salesforce, need precise board-level forecasting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“In August 2025, attackers stole OAuth tokens from Salesloft's Drift chatbot integration... FINRA issued a cybersecurity alert telling member firms to disconnect Salesloft integrations” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“SalesLoft had a data breach in August 2025 via the Drift integration that compromised 700+ organizations... users report concerning renewal practices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Be Cautious About (with specific reasons)... SalesLoft ... Cancellation nightmare ... Email bugs are severe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples: Outreach, Salesloft, ZoomInfo, heavy custom Salesforce builds. ... *Avoid*” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Field sales · negative prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 284 of the 311 answers that named Salesloft and are not a share of its labels.
754 of the 754 domain citations in answers naming Salesloft came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 237 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| News or press | 122 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 94 | 5 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 49 | 0 | 2025-05-06 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 39 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Case study | 35 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Conference or event | 24 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 0 | 2025-04-23 | ||
| Comparison | 11 | 0 | 2024-08-14 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-17 |
Every page salesloft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Salesloft's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: salesloft.com, trust.salesloft.com, salesloft.com/platform-overview. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesloft's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesloft, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesloft by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Salesloft is among the products AI models recommend first in Sales engagement platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.