Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 48 of 48, unchanged
Outreach · 14 categories · RankedOutreach
314Judge labels
43First choices
112Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
14Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
57% in Sales engagement for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 66 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 35% of its 62 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Outreach →By buyer segmentAn enterprise product: leader at enterprise, not named at small business.
Small business49 of 49
0%48 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market4 of 66
9%62 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 45
57%73 labels
endorsed leader
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Outreach for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 9% | 4 of 66 | 35% | 62 | criticized challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 2% | 16 of 77 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 23 of 76 | 20% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 61 of 72 | 40% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 26 of 52 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 89 of 94 | 50% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 38 of 116 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 48 of 123 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 57 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 52 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 69 of 73 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 0% | 104 of 110 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% | |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 36 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Website governance and accessibility | Marketing | 0% | 93 of 98 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Siteimprove at 25% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Outreach held within the floor in all fourteen categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales engagement · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 62
Enterprise▲+17Since September 2026: 42% → 59%, +17 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
59%from 42% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 45, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 15% | 10% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 15% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 4 of 66 |
| AI SDR | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 16 of 77 |
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 60 → 23 of 76 |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 25 → 61 of 72 |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 26 of 52 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 89 of 94, unchanged |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 116, unchanged |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 123, unchanged |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 57 of 71 |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 60, unchanged |
| Sales rooms | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 69 of 73, unchanged |
| Email deliverability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 104 of 110, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 66, unchanged |
| Website governance | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 93 of 98, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Outreach across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Outreach across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct56 labels16
Paraphrase48 labels17
Comparative65 labels23not counted in share
Budget-constrained40 labels6
Scale-constrained45 labels4
Negative60 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative314 labels in all, every segment counted; 43 of the 70 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Outreach | 150+ reps, complex workflows | $200–250/user/mo | Deepest customization, governance, enterprise features” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · scale prompt · first choice
“Deepest task‑driven sequencing and workflow controls... Enterprise SDR/orgs, RevOps teams needing deep forecasting” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice
“### 1. Outreach (now Outreach.ai) - Best for: Enterprise sales teams ... Deepest enterprise feature set” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice
“A leader in enterprise sales engagement, Outreach is known for AI-powered insights, multi-channel engagement” Mistral Small · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“This applies to Outreach, SalesLoft, and any tool that encourages high-volume, automated outreach — those platforms are now risking your domain reputation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“High-Caution Platforms (Frequent Red Flags): Outreach.io ... account termination complaints ... Best for enterprise but buggy for smaller teams.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
“you want to avoid premium enterprise platforms like Outreach or Salesloft, which require custom quotes, charge steep per-seat fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales engagement · budget prompt · hard negative
“be especially cautious with Outreach and Salesloft—they're enterpriseWorkflow platforms, not deliverability platforms” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outreach, over the 314 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outreach was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outreach, over the 314 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outreach was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Outreach. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 287 of the 314 answers that named Outreach and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com127
blog.hubspot.com100
g2.com93
avoma.com75
artisan.co66
resources.rework.com66
salesforge.ai64
learn.g2.com62
cleverly.co55
cloudtalk.io52
760 of the 760 domain citations in answers naming Outreach came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
outreach.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Outreach takes 9% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
outreach.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Outreach takes 9% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 33,100 a month (“outreach”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9,282 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 27,855 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,575 · 272 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,068
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $143 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
9%
rank 4 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 43 across its categories
- Named in
- 314 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 287 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on outreach.ai
1,322
subdomains included
Content
1,225
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
24 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,016 | 9 | 2026-09-28 | CRM, Sales engagement | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 77 | 0 | 2025-12-08 | ||
| Case study | 26 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 25 | 6 | 2026-08-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 22 | 0 | 2025-02-27 | ||
| News or press | 15 | 0 | 2022-01-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 12 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2020-12-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2022-11-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28What is sales intelligence glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-28Competitive intelligence battle cards blog
- 2026-09-24Forrester wave revenue orchestration 2026 blog
- 2026-09-22Idc marketscape unified revenue orchestration 2026 blog
- 2026-09-22What is revenue orchestration glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-18Ai powered sales forecasting blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page outreach.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Outreach
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Outreach; a claim can dispute any of them.
Outreach.io 9Outreach (with Kaia) 1Outreach (with quota/forecasting features) 1Outreach AI 1UserWay / Outreach 1
Follow Outreach
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Outreach is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Outreach is its own company.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Outreach
- Outreach Kaia, Outreach Voice, Outreach/Salesloft AI, Outreach/Salesloft native dialers
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Outreach's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Outreach, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Outreach by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Outreach is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Outreach, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.