Outreach

Named in 32 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 5 first choices, 12 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

19% in Sales engagement

Rank 3 of 32 products named in sales engagement platforms, criticized challenger. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 32 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Outreach. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales engagement platforms	Sales	19%	3 of 32	38%	32	criticized challenger

By model

How each model treated Outreach across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	2	1	1	2	6
Claude Opus 4.8	1	2	1	2	6
GPT-6 Astra	3	1	0	1	5
GPT-5.6 Sol	2	1	0	2	5
Gemini 3.1 Pro	2	1	0	3	6
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	1	1	2	4

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Outreach or Salesloft: Independent enterprise platforms when sequencing, administration, and complex outbound operations are central.” GPT-5.6 Sol · Sales engagement · scale prompt · first choice

“Both deserve an enterprise evaluation. Outreach combines engagement with account planning and sales execution” GPT-6 Astra · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice

“Outreach or Salesloft: The two heavyweights of the SEP market. They are highly robust, enterprise-grade” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Sales engagement · scale prompt · first choice

“Outreach and Salesloft are consistently positioned as the two dominant, enterprise-grade platforms” Claude Opus 4.8 · Sales engagement · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Outreach and Salesloft if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Sales engagement · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms like *Outreach*, *Salesloft*, or *Groove*.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Sales engagement · budget prompt · hard negative

“Outreach.io (Avoid for: SMBs & Startups)” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Sales engagement · negative prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise (Outreach, Salesloft): Powerful but frequently flagged for cost, complexity, and long contracts. Caution mainly for small teams.” Claude Opus 4.8 · Sales engagement · negative prompt · soft negative

Names read as Outreach

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Outreach; a claim can dispute any of them.

Outreach.io 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Outreach, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.