Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 11 of 72
Clari · 8 categories · RankedClari Copilot
300Judge labels
52First choices
95Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
8Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
66% in Revenue intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 1 of 76 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 40% of its 65 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Clari Copilot →By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
Small business13 of 75
2%53 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market1 of 76
28%65 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise1 of 73
66%74 labels
endorsed leader
In revenue intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Clari Copilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 28% | 1 of 76 | 40% | 65 | criticized challenger | ▲+10Since September 2026: 18% → 28%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 2% | 7 of 91 | 22% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 2% | 12 of 123 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 28 of 124 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 23 of 116 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% | |
| Dashboards and data visualization | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 23 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power BI at 52% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 0% | 48 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 29 of 52 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Clari Copilot held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Revenue intel · by segment
Mid-market▲+10Since September 2026: 18% → 28%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
28%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 2 → 1 of 68
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 66% → 71%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
71%from 66% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 1 of 66, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intel | 18% | 28% | ▲+10Since September 2026: 18% → 28%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 76 |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 7 of 91 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 62 → 12 of 123 |
| Sales coaching | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 28 of 124 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 116, unchanged |
| BI & dashboards | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 23 of 52, unchanged |
| Sales engagement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 66, unchanged |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 29 of 52 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Clari Copilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Clari Copilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Kimi K2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct57 labels17
Paraphrase37 labels19
Comparative68 labels19not counted in share
Budget-constrained37 labels6
Scale-constrained45 labels10
Negative56 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative300 labels in all, every segment counted; 52 of the 71 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“My Final Verdict: For a mid-sized B2B company trying to mature its sales processes, Clari is generally the safest high-value investment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For VPs of Sales: Clari is often preferred because its dashboarding focuses on forecast accuracy and risk flags across the entire team.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · first choice
“the strongest overall choice is usually Clari if your top priority is forecasting discipline and pipeline inspection” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue intel · direct prompt · first choice
“the safest single answer is usually Clari if your primary need is revenue intelligence + forecasting in one platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue intel · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid these enterprise forecasters unless you have already solved your CRM data hygiene issues” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-grade platforms like Clari, Gong, Aviso, or Anaplan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... Premium forecasting with complex implementation” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid for Budget Constraints ... Clari: $200-310/user/month” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Clari Copilot, over the 298 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clari Copilot was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Clari Copilot, over the 298 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clari Copilot was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Clari Copilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 276 of the 298 answers that named Clari Copilot and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com148
avoma.com126
demandbase.com90
cleverly.co75
zapier.com70
g2.com68
optif.ai68
salesmotion.io68
guideflow.com61
blog.hubspot.com59
833 of the 833 domain citations in answers naming Clari Copilot came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Clari Copilot stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Clari Copilot stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“clari copilot”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Its company's site
- clari.com shared with Clari's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 444,225 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,353 · 321 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,970
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
28%
rank 1 of 76 in revenue intel
First choices
52
across its categories
- Named in
- 298 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 276 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Clari Copilot
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Clari Copilot; a claim can dispute any of them.
Clari 81Clari Copilot (formerly Wingman) 3Clari (Align) 1Clari + Salesloft 1Clari Copilot (ex-Wingman) 1Salesloft / Clari Copilot 1Wingman 1Wingman (by Clari) 1
Follow Clari Copilot
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Clari is the company behind Clari Copilot.ShowHide
The company
Clari is the company behind Clari Copilot.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Clari
- Clari Align, Clari Forecast, Clari+Salesloft, Groove
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Clari Copilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Clari Copilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Clari Copilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Clari Copilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Clari Copilot, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Clari Copilot is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Clari Copilot is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Clari Copilot first in Revenue intelligence and forecasting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.