Every category where a model named Revenue Grid for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	2%	9 of 75	7%	30	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Revenue Grid yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Revenue Grid across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	4	0	0	4
Mistral Small	0	5	0	0	5
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	1	1	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative23 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained12 labels1

Negative12 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Revenue Grid is the most budget-friendly option” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · first choice

“transparent pricing starting around $30 per user per month, far below the enterprise norm” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue intel · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Revenue Grid if: You're Salesforce-heavy and want lightweight automation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best Salesforce-native option... automated activity capture inside Salesforce” Mistral Small · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Single-vendor dependency: Platforms tightly integrated with specific CRMs (e.g., Revenue Grid/Salesforce, Chorus/ZoomInfo)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative

“Setup Nightmares & Stability Issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Revenue Grid, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Revenue Grid was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Clari Copilot64 of 7018Not in the top three

Gong63 of 7014Not in the top three

Avoma43 of 7014Not in the top three

Salesloft29 of 701Not in the top three

People.ai28 of 700Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub27 of 706Not in the top three

Chorus by ZoomInfo27 of 700Not in the top three

6sense21 of 700Not in the top three

BoostUp18 of 702Not in the top three

Oliv17 of 702Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Revenue Grid. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 70 answers that named Revenue Grid and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com7

forecastio.ai6

oliv.ai5

zapier.com5

kayako.com4

salesmotion.io4

goairspeed.com3

guideflow.com3

landbase.com3

marketbetter.ai3

Forty-three of the forty-three domain citations in answers naming Revenue Grid came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forecastio.ai/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms5

oliv.ai/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-software-platforms5

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/revenue-intelligence-tools5

zapier.com/blog/revenue-intelligence-platform5

kayako.com/blog/top-revenue-intelligence-platforms-b2b-sales4

salesmotion.io/blog/revenue-intelligence-platform-guide4

goairspeed.com/academy/alternatives/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms3

guideflow.com/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Revenue Grid's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Revenue Grid, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at revenue.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.