AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Revenue Grid · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Revenue Grid

44Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Revenue intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 15 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Revenue Grid →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In revenue intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Revenue Grid for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales4%7 of 760%15accepted challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Sales engagement platformsSales0%24 of 660%2under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Revenue Grid held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Revenue intel · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 8 → 17 of 72
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 10 → 8 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 7 → 8 of 66

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Revenue intel2%2%▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 10 → 7 of 76
Sales engagement0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 24 of 66, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Revenue Grid across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2011103
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labels2
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative15 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained11 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Positioned as Best Value in 2025 expert reviews: Salesforce-native with robust automation at mid-market pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Revenue intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Start with Revenue Grid if you're on Salesforce—it's repeatedly highlighted as the unified mid-market leader” Grok 4.20 · Revenue intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Only Salesforce-native platform bundling engagement, activity capture, and AI forecasting” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales engagement · direct prompt · alternative
“Consider Revenue Grid (~$30/user/mo) for native Salesforce activity capture.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales engagement · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Revenue Grid, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Revenue Grid was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gong35 of 4412Compare →
Salesloft21 of 442Not among the top eight
Outreach19 of 442Not among the top eight
People.ai18 of 440Not among the top eight
Chorus by ZoomInfo10 of 440Not among the top eight
6sense9 of 440Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Revenue Grid. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 44 answers that named Revenue Grid and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avoma.com27
demandbase.com25
cleverly.co23
revenuegrid.com22
salesmotion.io21
pipeline.zoominfo.com20
optif.ai19
zapier.com18
guideflow.com13
superagi.com13

201 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming Revenue Grid came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

revenue.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Revenue Grid takes 4% of first choices and Clari Copilot takes 28%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“revenue grid”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
14 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 16,889 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,358 · 157 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,812
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Revenue, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 7 of 76 in revenue intel
Segment leader
28%
Clari Copilot
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 43 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on revenue.io
2,315
subdomains included
Content
611
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,328
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer18312026-07-06
Blog177292026-08-25
Comparison5642026-07-08
Webinar or virtual event45undated
Template or tool4312026-07-29
Report or ebook3902025-06-12
Podcast or video3902026-04-08
Case study2212026-08-04
Conference or event712026-08-03
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page revenue.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Revenue Grid

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Revenue Grid is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The complete AI Sales Engagement and Conversation Intelligence Platform with real-time guidance.
For
sales teams
Price stated
Contact sales for custom pricing. revenue.io
Starting price
0 revenue.io
Certifications
SOC 2 Examination CompleteSOC 2HIPAAGDPRCCPATCPACASA Tier 2 Certified
Customers named
HPENutanixSquareDun & BradstreetYlopoBlockNFI IndustriesAmazon Business
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Revenue Grid's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: revenue.io, revenue.io/pricing, revenue.io/security, revenue.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Revenue Grid's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Revenue Grid, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Revenue Grid by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Revenue Grid is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Revenue Grid, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at revenue.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.