GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Salesforce Revenue Intelligence · September 2026 Edition
Salesforce · 1 category · Ranked

Salesforce Revenue Intelligence

37Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Revenue intel for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In revenue intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Salesforce Revenue Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales0%19 of 750%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Salesforce Revenue Intelligence yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Salesforce Revenue Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If already using Salesforce, consider Salesforce Revenue Intelligence or Revenue Grid for native integration.” Llama 4 Maverick · Revenue intel · scale prompt · alternative
“Enterprise: Gong (despite concerns), Clari (despite concerns), Salesforce Revenue Intelligence” Mistral Small · Revenue intel · negative prompt · alternative
“Einstein AI for deal scoring/forecasting, templated dashboards; seamless w/ Sales Cloud.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you already live in Salesforce, start with Salesforce Revenue Intelligence.” GPT-5.4 mini · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Salesforce Revenue Intelligence, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesforce Revenue Intelligence was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Clari Copilot36 of 3718Not in the top three
Gong32 of 3711Not in the top three
People.ai17 of 370Not in the top three
Aviso16 of 371Not in the top three
Revenue Grid16 of 371Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub13 of 372Not in the top three
Avoma11 of 374Not in the top three
BoostUp11 of 370Not in the top three
Chorus by ZoomInfo10 of 370Not in the top three
Salesloft8 of 371Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesforce Revenue Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 37 answers that named Salesforce Revenue Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com5
zapier.com5
forecastio.ai4
blog.sendspark.com3
clari.com3
goairspeed.com3
guideflow.com3
help.salesforce.comYour site3
kayako.com3
marketbetter.ai3

Thirty-two of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Salesforce Revenue Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Salesforce Revenue Intelligence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesforce Revenue Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.
Salesforce 1

The company

Salesforce is the company behind Salesforce Revenue Intelligence.
Website
salesforce.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
1999
Employees
about 35,000 (2019)
Ownership
Public, CRM on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesforce Revenue Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesforce Revenue Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salesforce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack