Avoma

Named in 27 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 4 first choices, 2 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

18% in Conversation intel

Rank 2 of 50 products named in conversational intelligence and call recording, accepted challenger. 2 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 27 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Avoma. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Conversational intelligence and call recording	Sales	18%	2 of 50	7%	27	accepted challenger

By model

How each model treated Avoma across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	1	3	1	0	5
Claude Opus 4.8	0	3	1	0	4
GPT-6 Astra	0	4	0	0	4
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	3	0	1	4
Gemini 3.1 Pro	1	4	0	1	6
Perplexity Sonar Pro	2	2	0	0	4

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need a more flexible, seat-based model that scales cleanly from 20 to 100 reps, Avoma is likely your best bet.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Conversation intel · direct prompt · first choice

“Avoma is usually the best value if you want real conversation intelligence (not just transcripts) on a tight budget.” Claude Opus 5 · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice

“the best overall value is usually Avoma for teams that want recording plus real conversation intelligence” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Conversation intel · budget prompt · first choice

“the strongest default choice is Avoma” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Conversation intel · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“these platforms rely on the same "third-party bot" architecture as Otter and Fireflies” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Conversation intel · negative prompt · soft negative

“Probably too expensive for a tightly constrained budget” GPT-5.6 Sol · Conversation intel · budget prompt · soft negative

Names read as Avoma

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Avoma; a claim can dispute any of them.

Avoma + CI add-on 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avoma, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.