AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Grain · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Grain

46Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Revenue intel for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 91 in the mid-market standing
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In conversation intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Grain for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Conversational intelligence and call recordingSales2%8 of 9117%6under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Revenue intelligence and forecastingSales0%21 of 760%8under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Grain held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Conversation intel · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 10 → 14 of 63
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 26 → 9 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 65 of 91

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Conversation intel0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 26 → 8 of 91
Revenue intel2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 14 → 21 of 76

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Grain across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01012
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“likely to be Avoma, Grain, or other AI-native conversation intelligence tools” Llama 4 Maverick · Conversation intel · direct prompt · first choice
“Best if you only need basic revenue intelligence: Grain or tl;dv — lower-cost tools, but the results describe them as more limited than Sybill” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue intel · budget prompt · alternative
“Most Affordable Entry Point ... Perfect for teams primarily needing call coaching and meeting analysis” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · budget prompt · alternative
“Grain offers more features at competitive pricing with no long-term commitment required” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Conversation intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“described as meeting-note or chat tools that appear in CI rankings mainly because they do transcription” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Grain, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Grain was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gong38 of 462Not among the top eight
Avoma34 of 4613Not among the top eight
Clari Copilot24 of 461Not among the top eight
Fathom20 of 464Not among the top eight
tl;dv20 of 460Not among the top eight
Chorus by ZoomInfo14 of 460Not among the top eight
Fireflies.ai12 of 468Not among the top eight
HubSpot Sales Hub12 of 465Not among the top eight
Jiminny11 of 462Not among the top eight
Sybill10 of 466Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Grain. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 46 of the 46 answers that named Grain and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avoma.com27
optif.ai23
cirrusinsight.com19
salesmotion.io18
cleverly.co17
pipeline.zoominfo.com17
demandbase.com16
cloudtalk.io15
sybill.ai14
blog.hubspot.com13

179 of the 179 domain citations in answers naming Grain came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

grain.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Grain takes 2% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“grain”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
90,951 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 6,237 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,540 · 34 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,387
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2023, as Grain Intelligence, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 8 of 91 in conversation intel
Segment leader
41%
Avoma
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
46 answers
Its own site cited
in 46 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on grain.com
395
subdomains included
Content
147
counted in the table below
Documentation
192
Product · Integration
4 · 10
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog139undated
Comparison502024-08-17
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Glossary or explainer1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page grain.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Grain

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Grain; a claim can dispute any of them.
Grain / tl;dv 1

Follow Grain

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Grain is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI Notetaker Built for Growing Teams
For
any team that relies on meetings, especially small to mid-market and enterprise sales, customer success, and product teams
Price stated
Grain offers a free plan with unlimited meetings for teams. Paid plans start at $15/month per user for unlimited meetings, advanced AI, conversational intelligence, and additional features. grain.com
Starting price
15/month per user grain.com
Free plan or trial
free plan with unlimited meetings; free forever; 14-day free trial grain.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliant
Hosting
USA
Customers named
User Interviewsneo.taxTangoReforgeArrowsApplyPodiumEndgame
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Grain's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: grain.com, grain.com/pricing, trust.grain.com, grain.com/use-case/product, grain.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Grain's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Grain, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Grain by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Grain is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Grain, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at grain.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.