| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 20 of 76 | 13% | 15 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Territory and quota planning | Revenue operations | 0% | 52 of 123 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ Planning at 36% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 20 of 76 |
| Territory planning | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 123, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best if you are Salesforce-centric: Aviso or another Salesforce-native forecasting tool” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Aviso if: You have complex revenue models needing sophisticated prediction” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“For AI-driven forecasting and quota alignment, Aviso is a strong contender.” Mistral Small · Territory planning · direct prompt · alternative
“Forecasting-first: Aviso (growing traction in predictive pipeline management)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Enterprise-grade platforms like Clari, Gong, Aviso, or Anaplan” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reviewers report bugs and slow performance, dashboard customization reverts unexpectedly” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named Aviso and are not a share of its labels.
141 of the 155 domain citations in answers naming Aviso came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 364 | 24 | 2026-09-29 | CRM, Sales engagement | |
| Podcast or video | 299 | 85 | 2026-09-29 | CRM, Sales engagement | |
| Report or ebook | 43 | 29 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 36 | 17 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| News or press | 32 | 8 | 2026-09-29 | Revenue intel | |
| Case study | 12 | 12 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | 10 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 1 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2023-10-30 |
Every page aviso.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (16); 3 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
What Aviso's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aviso.com, aviso.com/pricing, aviso.com/compliance, aviso.com/platform, aviso.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aviso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aviso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aviso by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: