Every category where a model named Aviso for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	26 of 75	18%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aviso yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aviso across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	2	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained5 labels1

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Designed for enterprises, offers 98% forecast accuracy.” Llama 4 Maverick · Revenue intel · scale prompt · alternative

“Alternative 2 (AI-Driven Prediction): Aviso” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“AI-Native Predictive Forecasting” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid... Aviso — enterprise-only ($50K+ minimums, needs data science support)” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Aviso \u2014 $50K\u2013$85K/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aviso, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aviso was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Clari Copilot43 of 4524Not in the top three

Gong40 of 4510Not in the top three

People.ai18 of 450Not in the top three

Salesforce Revenue Intelligence16 of 451Not in the top three

Revenue Grid15 of 451Not in the top three

BoostUp14 of 451Not in the top three

Salesloft13 of 450Not in the top three

Revenue.io12 of 450Not in the top three

6sense10 of 450Not in the top three

HubSpot Sales Hub10 of 450Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aviso. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 45 answers that named Aviso and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com5

blog.sendspark.com3

forecastio.ai3

salesforce.com3

salesmotion.io3

sybill.ai3

zapier.com3

croclub.com2

goairspeed.com2

landbase.com2

Twenty-nine of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Aviso came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipeline.zoominfo.com/sales/revenue-intelligence-tools4

blog.sendspark.com/revenue-intelligence-platforms3

salesmotion.io/blog/revenue-intelligence-platform-guide3

sybill.ai/blogs/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms3

zapier.com/blog/revenue-intelligence-platform3

croclub.com/tools/best-revenue-intelligence-platform2

forecastio.ai/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms2

goairspeed.com/academy/alternatives/best-revenue-intelligence-platforms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Aviso

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Aviso; a claim can dispute any of them.

Aviso AI 1

The company

Aviso AI is the company behind Aviso.

Website: aviso.com
Headquarters: Redwood City, United States
Founded: 2012

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aviso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aviso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aviso.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.