Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 25 of 72
6 categories · RankedRevenue.io
58Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Revenue intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 22 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Revenue.io →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 75
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 76
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise60 of 73
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
In revenue intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Revenue.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intelligence and forecasting | Sales | 0% | 22 of 76 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 19 of 91 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 24 of 124 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Call tracking platforms | Marketing | 0% | 29 of 63 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by CallRail at 43% | |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 56 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales dialers and calling | Sales | 0% | 61 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CloudTalk at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Revenue.io held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Revenue intel · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 22 of 68
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 25 → 52 of 66
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue intel | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 22 of 76 |
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 19 of 91 |
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 24 of 124 |
| Call tracking | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 29 of 63, unchanged |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 56 of 111 |
| Dialers | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 61 of 75, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Revenue.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Revenue.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative27 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The only 100% Salesforce-native platform in this category... Delivers real-time, context-aware battlecards” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for live call coaching: Revenue.io” Perplexity Sonar · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · first choice
“called the best revenue intelligence platform in 2026 for Salesforce teams that need intelligence connected to real-time execution” Muse Glimmer 30B · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you are heavily invested in Salesforce, Salesforce Revenue Intelligence or Revenue.io are natural fits.” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue intel · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms with "recording-dependent" limitations (e.g., Revenue.io, Chorus by ZoomInfo): If your sellers rely more on email/chat than calls, the value drops significantly.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative
“Narrow integration ecosystem could create data silos.” Kimi K2 · Revenue intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Revenue.io, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Revenue.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Revenue.io, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Revenue.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Revenue.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 58 answers that named Revenue.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
revenue.ioYour site38
pipeline.zoominfo.com32
avoma.com22
cirrusinsight.com16
demandbase.com15
zapier.com15
blog.hubspot.com14
cleverly.co13
g2.com12
learn.g2.com12
151 of the 189 domain citations in answers naming Revenue.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
revenue.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Revenue.io takes 0% of first choices and Clari Copilot takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
revenue.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Revenue.io takes 0% of first choices and Clari Copilot takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best revenue intelligence and forecasting platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“revenue.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,889 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,358 · 157 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,812
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 76 in revenue intel
Segment leader
28%
Clari Copilot
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 58 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 58 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on revenue.io
2,315
subdomains included
Content
611
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,328
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 183 | 1 | 2026-07-06 | ||
| Blog | 177 | 29 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Comparison | 56 | 4 | 2026-07-08 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 45 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 43 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Report or ebook | 39 | 0 | 2025-06-12 | ||
| Podcast or video | 39 | 0 | 2026-04-08 | ||
| Case study | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 1 | 2026-08-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-25What sales leaders should present about pipeline and revenue blog
- 2026-08-24How to build a sales hiring profile using coaching data blog
- 2026-08-21What changes when you start coaching instead of selling blog
- 2026-08-20How procurement delays kill deals blog
- 2026-08-20Why your sales training does not stick and what replaces it blog
- 2026-08-20What top performer sales calls have in common blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page revenue.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Revenue.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Revenue.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
Revenue.io (formerly RingDNA) 1
Follow Revenue.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Revenue.io is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Revenue.io is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Revenue.io is the Salesforce-native Revenue Orchestration Platform, unifying dialers, guided selling, call tracking, conversation intelligence, and AI agents to drive performance before, during, and after every sales call.
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- Contact sales for custom pricing. revenue.io
- Starting price
- 0 revenue.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Examination CompleteSecurity LogoSOC 2HIPAAGDPRCCPATCPACASA Tier 2 Certified
- Customers named
- HPENutanixSquareDun & BradstreetYlopoBlockNFI IndustriesAmazon Business
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Revenue.io's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: revenue.io, revenue.io/pricing, revenue.io/security, revenue.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Revenue.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Revenue.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Revenue.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Revenue.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Revenue.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.