Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 43 of 63
Outreach · 2 categories · RankedOutreach Kaia
25Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Conversation intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 91 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business46 of 66
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 91
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise21 of 96
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
In conversation intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Outreach Kaia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 16 of 91 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 94 of 124 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Outreach Kaia held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Conversation intel · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 13 → 17 of 87
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 19 of 91
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 16 of 91 |
| Sales coaching | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 94 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Outreach Kaia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Outreach Kaia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“adding their native Conversation Intelligence module (Cadence by Salesloft or Outreach Voice) is the path of least resistance” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversation intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If your B2B team is already using one of these Sales Engagement Platforms ... use their built-in CI tools.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Conversation intel · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Outreach if you want conversation intelligence tightly bundled with revenue orchestration” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · direct prompt · alternative
“Teams already using Outreach | Combines call capture and analysis with live rep assistance” GPT-6 Luna · Conversation intel · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“major enterprise tools (like Gong, Mindtickle, or Outreach) require thousands of dollars in upfront platform fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales coaching · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outreach Kaia, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outreach Kaia was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Outreach Kaia, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Outreach Kaia was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Outreach Kaia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named Outreach Kaia and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cirrusinsight.com17
pipeline.zoominfo.com13
cloudtalk.io12
outreach.aiYour site12
blog.hubspot.com10
revenue.io10
g2.com9
avoma.com8
techrepublic.com8
claap.io7
Ninety-four of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Outreach Kaia came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
outreach.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Outreach Kaia takes 0% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
outreach.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Outreach Kaia takes 0% of first choices and Avoma takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best conversation intelligence and call recording platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“outreach kaia”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Its company's site
- outreach.ai shared with Outreach's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 27,855 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,575 · 272 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 6,068
- Paid Google search
- 1 searches its ads show for, about 4 clicks and $143 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 91 in conversation intel
Segment leader
41%
Avoma
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Outreach Kaia
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Outreach Kaia; a claim can dispute any of them.
Outreach 8Outreach (Kaia) 1
Follow Outreach Kaia
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Outreach is the company behind Outreach Kaia.ShowHide
The company
Outreach is the company behind Outreach Kaia.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Outreach
- Outreach, Outreach Voice, Outreach/Salesloft AI, Outreach/Salesloft native dialers
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
- For
- revenue teams
- Customers named
- AmplitudeSiemensOmniplexWorldpayAvananQuantcastJP Cheung
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Outreach Kaia's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: outreach.ai, outreach.ai/pricing, outreach.ai/platform/trust, outreach.ai/platform, outreach.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Outreach Kaia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Outreach Kaia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Outreach Kaia by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Outreach Kaia is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Outreach Kaia, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.