Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 64 of 66, unchanged
Salesloft · 1 category · RankedSalesloft Rhythm
19Judge labels
2First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in AI SDR for enterprise buyers
Rank 12 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business72 of 74
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 77
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise11 of 77
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Salesloft Rhythm for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 2% | 12 of 77 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Salesloft Rhythm held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI SDR · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 12 of 70
Enterprise▼−6Since September 2026: 9% → 2%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 9% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 5 → 11 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 12 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Salesloft Rhythm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Salesloft Rhythm across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“1. Salesloft: Provides a revenue orchestration platform that automates email sequences, call tasks, and LinkedIn outreach” Llama 4 Maverick · AI SDR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Stands out for its ease of adoption, coaching insights, and CRM-centric workflows” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI SDR · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid if you're looking for cutting-edge autonomy; these are better for traditional process management.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Salesloft Rhythm, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesloft Rhythm was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Salesloft Rhythm, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Salesloft Rhythm was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Salesloft Rhythm. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 19 answers that named Salesloft Rhythm and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
artisan.co11
salesforge.ai11
pipeline.zoominfo.com10
11x.ai9
amplemarket.com9
unifygtm.com8
monday.com7
getvoip.com6
aisdr.com5
instantly.ai5
Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Salesloft Rhythm came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
salesloft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Salesloft Rhythm takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
salesloft.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Salesloft Rhythm takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai sdr agent”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai sdr agent”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“salesloft rhythm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- salesloft.com shared with Salesloft's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 52,058 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,534 · 539 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,971
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 103 clicks and $4,229 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 77 in AI SDR
Segment leader
24%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 19 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Salesloft Rhythm
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Salesloft Rhythm; a claim can dispute any of them.
Salesloft 5
Follow Salesloft Rhythm
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Salesloft is the company behind Salesloft Rhythm.ShowHide
The company
Salesloft is the company behind Salesloft Rhythm.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- salesloft.com
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, United States
- Founded
- 2011
- Also from Salesloft
- Drift, Salesloft, Salesloft Conversations, Salesloft Dialer
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Prioritize your workflow
- For
- Sellers
- Customers named
- Cin7
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Salesloft Rhythm's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: salesloft.com/sales-ai-summit, salesloft.com/platform/ai-agents, community.salesloft.com/product-q-a-7/new-course-rhythm-fundamentals-247, community.salesloft.com/salesloft-admins-16/routing-negative-nps-scores-into-a-rhythm-task-528, community.salesloft.com/learnings-wins-12/level-up-your-revenue-rhythm-with-the-cadences-designer-workbook-2523. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Salesloft Rhythm's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Salesloft Rhythm, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Salesloft Rhythm by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Salesloft Rhythm is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Salesloft Rhythm, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.