Small business▼−1Since September 2026: 22% → 21%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
21%from 22% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 2 of 66, unchanged
1 category · RankedAiSDR
112Judge labels
25First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
23% in AI SDR for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 77 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 42 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of AiSDR →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 74
23%47 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 77
18%42 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 77
6%23 labels
accepted challenger
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named AiSDR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR agents | Sales | 18% | 3 of 77 | 7% | 42 | accepted challenger | ▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 17%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, AiSDR moved past the floor in its one category, AI SDR, +14 points to 17%.
Best category · AI SDR · by segment
Mid-market▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 17%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
17%from 2% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 3 pointsRank 9 → 3 of 70
Enterprise▼−8Since September 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 3 pointsRank 4 → 5 of 69
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI SDR | 2% | 17% | ▲+14Since September 2026: 2% → 17%, +14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 9 → 3 of 77 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated AiSDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated AiSDR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels8
Paraphrase14 labels4
Comparative34 labels13not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels12
Scale-constrained6 labels1
Negative10 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative112 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 39 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you specifically need an autonomous AI SDR agent, AiSDR Solo at $250/mo is the current entry price point” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI SDR · budget prompt · first choice
“AiSDR - Leads in many benchmarks for signals, personalization, reply handling, and reasoning.” Grok 4.20 · AI SDR · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with AiSDR or Artisan for pure AI SDR autonomy in mid-market B2B outbound.” Grok 4.20 · AI SDR · direct prompt · first choice
“Artisan or AiSDR are strong choices if you want full autonomy in outbound execution.” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“they appear more specialized and less universally established than Apollo or Qualified” GPT-5.4 mini · AI SDR · direct prompt · soft negative
“Not necessarily bad, but has specific limitations... it struggles with *cold outreach*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI SDR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Good for lead nurturing, weaker for cold outreach” Kimi K2 · AI SDR · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AiSDR, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AiSDR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as AiSDR, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AiSDR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AiSDR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 112 of the 112 answers that named AiSDR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
artisan.co81
salesforge.ai73
aisdr.comYour site43
amplemarket.com39
11x.ai37
getvoip.com37
pipeline.zoominfo.com35
coldreach.ai28
clay.com24
salesmotion.io24
378 of the 421 domain citations in answers naming AiSDR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
aisdr.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AiSDR takes 18% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
aisdr.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, AiSDR takes 18% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “ai sdr agent”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai sdr agent”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“aisdr”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 8,418 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,292 · 110 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,776
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
18%
rank 3 of 77 in AI SDR
Segment leader
24%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 112 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 112 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on aisdr.com
3,349
subdomains included
Content
759
counted in the table below
Documentation
198
Product · Integration
1 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 578 | 37 | 2026-09-17 | CRM, SEO | |
| Comparison | 92 | 34 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Podcast or video | 32 | 0 | 2024-10-02 | ||
| Case study | 16 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 16 | 2 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Conference or event | 11 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 10 | undated | CRM | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17List building tools blog
- 2026-09-16Saleshandy vs apollo comparison
- 2026-09-15Amplemarket alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-14Outplay alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-1111x alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-10Saleshandy alternatives comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page aisdr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as AiSDR
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AiSDR; a claim can dispute any of them.
AiSDR (Ami) 1AiSDR / Ami 1
Follow AiSDR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
AiSDR Inc. is the company behind AiSDR.ShowHide
The company
AiSDR Inc. is the company behind AiSDR.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- aisdr.com
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2023
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Your AI SDR that books meetings
- For
- Revenue team that needs pipeline without adding headcount; Founder who needs revenue yesterday and can’t wait 6+ months for inbound; Sales leader tired of AI activity that results in 0 revenue; SDR who wants to get outbound right the first time; Leader who wants human judgment where it matters
- Price stated
- $900/mo Billed quarterly aisdr.com
- Starting price
- $900/mo aisdr.com
- Free plan or trial
- We currently don’t offer a free trial aisdr.com/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 3 aisdr.com · 6 aisdr.com/pricing pages disagree
- Customers named
- Global SystemsNovartisPfizerViatrisGeneAstellasMerckBiogen
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What AiSDR's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aisdr.com, aisdr.com/pricing, trust.aisdr.com, aisdr.com/platform. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AiSDR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AiSDR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AiSDR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where AiSDR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name AiSDR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where AiSDR is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where AiSDR is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAiSDR is among the products AI models recommend first in AI SDR agents this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.