AiSDR vs Agent Frank
Zero of twelve models named AiSDR first on the direct prompt; zero named Agent Frank. AiSDR was named by twelve of the twelve models and Agent Frank by eight and AiSDR carries 37 labels and Agent Frank 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By AiSDR Inc., San Francisco, United States, founded 2023. Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
AiSDRFirst choices, of twelve modelsAgent Frank
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, AiSDR and Agent Frank were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 99 answers naming AiSDR and the 28 naming Agent Frank. In those answers Agent Frank took the first choice two times and AiSDR three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
AiSDR Agent Frank first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, AiSDR on the left and Agent Frank on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
AiSDR22%#2 of 8Agent Frank9%#3 of 8AiSDR2%#5 of 11Agent Frank2%#7 of 11AiSDR13%#2 of 11Agent Frank—not namedWhat the models said about AiSDR
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“AiSDR - Platform compliance issues, quality degradation at scale” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“AiSDR has significant control and flexibility limitations at a premium price point, with concerning hallucination rates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Most teams should start with Tier 1 or 2 before jumping to Tier 3 autonomous agents.” MiniMax M2.5 · scale prompt · soft negative
“AiSDR | Only major vendor with quarterly contracts ($900/mo), transparent pricing, lower commitment risk” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“Go with AiSDR for a hands-off, autonomous experience at mid-tier pricing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“🏆 Best Overall Value: AiSDR” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Agent Frank
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Top Pick: Agent Frank (Salesforge) - $499/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“If you want a highly scalable, fully autonomous email worker: Go with Agent Frank at $499/month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
“Agent Frank at $416/mo (on annual billing) is the cheapest turnkey solution with proven ROI” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.