Apollo.io vs Agent Frank
Three of fourteen models named Apollo.io first on the direct prompt; zero named Agent Frank. Apollo.io was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Agent Frank by eight and Apollo.io carries 33 labels and Agent Frank 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2015. Named in twenty-six categories this edition.
Agent Frank
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI SDR agents page.
By framing
Apollo.ioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAgent FrankEvery model, every framing
| Model | DirectAF | ParaphraseAF | ComparativeAF | Budget-constrainedAF | Scale-constrainedAF | NegativeAF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | AF | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | AF | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | AF | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | AF | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | AF | AF | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | AF | AF | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Apollo.ioAF Agent Frank first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Apollo.io on the left and Agent Frank on the right.The direct prompt
Apollo.io first, Agent Frank not the choice
3 of 14 modelsAgent Frank was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Apollo.io32%#1 of 9Apollo.io24%#1 of 12Apollo.io0%#11 of 11What the models said about Apollo.io
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Best for budget-conscious teams wanting database + outreach in one tab, giving high-end AI power to small teams who don't have a $5,000 monthly budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Agent Frank
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“One of the most cost-effective options with genuine autonomy for a low price point.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Agent Frank (Salesforge) Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Agent Frank (Salesforge) | Teams automating full meeting-booking | $499/mo | Learns from corrections, own infrastructure” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.